Comments on: There is a new idiot on the sports scene

By: wow powerleveling

wow powerleveling — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:51 +0000

As for Ford, why I don’t agree with some of the things that he writes, he’s the best in the business… hands down. He knows everyone in the league and everyone in the league reads him. He pisses people off because he writes things like he wrote today … but as a reader, I’d rather read an honest take instead of the bland p.r. that David Aldridge spews.

By: runescape money

runescape money — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:51 +0000

Nash is very critical to the Suns but that is only because they don’t have a backup PG on their roster who can play (Parker and Barbosa as the backup PGs… Are you kidding me?). The only guy on the Suns who can distribute the ball well is Nash, which is why he gets 11 assists/game. The Suns have zero depth at PG and that is going to kill them in the playoffs although it makes Nash’s plus/minus rating look fantastic.

By: phone bell

phone bell — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:50 +0000

I haven’t been up to much these days. Today was a loss. I’ve just been letting everything pass me by lately. My mind is like a bunch of nothing, but shrug.
phone cards

By: college blackout

college blackout — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:50 +0000

Chad ford is the worst

By: thynoe

thynoe — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:50 +0000

I think the journalist was right and that was according to one of my dates from webdatedotcom, i advise you to sue him, but is that an infringement of the right for freedom of expression?? Maybe yes, maybe not

By: Vlafimir

Vlafimir — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:50 +0000

But as i remember, Chad Ford once wrote that the mavs were willing to trade Dirk Nowitzki to the raptors for V.C. Enough said about chad ford!!.

By: matt kohn

matt kohn — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:44 +0000

Your blog is probably read by more people than an article written by Chad Ford. That makes you control the ‘agenda’ of his article.

Bloggers caught the Dan Rather/CBS monkey business by changing the ‘agenda’ of the report from Bush’s National Guard service to how poorly the report was researched and the bias with which it was broadcast.

End of story.

By: Kedar

Kedar — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:44 +0000

I guess the problem here is ESPN has so much coverage, better than any other sports site and being the only dedicated sports channel ( no one cares about Fox Sports since it lacks ability to show live games) is the problem here. Somebody should put a competation to this. I am not sure why it does not make sense for other networks but I would rather have sports channel than showing games on main network. Looking at the sports audiance I guess that is not difficult market to withstand.

And of course, whoever pays for ESPN insider are the most dumb, spoiled rich basterds.

By: Kedar

Kedar — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:44 +0000

And of course, whoever pays for ESPN insider are the most dumb, spoiled rich basterds.

By: Dale

Dale — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:01:44 +0000

Check out Dan Gillmor’s blog entry and The end objectivity.

Maybe it’s time to say a fond farewell to an old canon of journalism: objectivity. But it will never be time to kiss off the values and principles that undergird the idea.

http://dangillmor.typepad.com/dan_gillmor_on_grassroots/2005/01/the_end_of_obje.html