<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Bloggers  &#8211; the new paparazzi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cars</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>cars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7241</guid>
		<description>The blogs impassion, worry, disturb, challenge. Certain scorn them, others hold them for the prophets of a new revolution of information. &lt;br&gt;In fact, because they untie the languages of the ordinary citizens, they are a formidable tool for the freedom of expression. In the countries where the censure is queen, when the traditional media live in the shade of the capacity, the bloggers are often the only true journalists. They are the only ones to publish independent, even if it means information to displease with their government and sometimes with the risk of their freedom. &lt;br&gt;Reporters without borders designed this guide to help them, by useful recommendations and technical easy ways, to preserve their anonymity, to circumvent the censure - by identifying the technique best adapted to each situation -, but also to launching a blog under good conditions, to make known it - by optimizing its referencing on the search engines -, and to sit its credibility via the respect of some ethical and journalistic rules. &lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blogs impassion, worry, disturb, challenge. Certain scorn them, others hold them for the prophets of a new revolution of information. <br />In fact, because they untie the languages of the ordinary citizens, they are a formidable tool for the freedom of expression. In the countries where the censure is queen, when the traditional media live in the shade of the capacity, the bloggers are often the only true journalists. They are the only ones to publish independent, even if it means information to displease with their government and sometimes with the risk of their freedom. <br />Reporters without borders designed this guide to help them, by useful recommendations and technical easy ways, to preserve their anonymity, to circumvent the censure &#8211; by identifying the technique best adapted to each situation -, but also to launching a blog under good conditions, to make known it &#8211; by optimizing its referencing on the search engines -, and to sit its credibility via the respect of some ethical and journalistic rules. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paparazzo1</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7240</link>
		<dc:creator>paparazzo1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7240</guid>
		<description>ANTONELLO DE PIERRO E CARLA SOLARO SI SPOSANO &lt;br&gt;ANTONELLO DE PIERRO E CARLA SOLARO SI SPOSANO &lt;br&gt;Dopo essere stati beccati al mare in atteggiamenti ambigui, ecco che il direttore di Italymedia.it Antonello De Pierro e la nota attrice tintobrassiana Carla Solaro si sono sposati, e per convolare a giuste nozze hanno scelto Aosta, la citt natale di lei, con una festa per pochi intimi in un noto pub della citt alpina. Visto che la Solaro  stata la protagonista del Calendario Italymedia.it 2007 evidentemente il set fotografico fu galeotto. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Per vedere il servizio fotografico &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fotogossip.tripod.com/carlasolaro/carla_solaro_antonello_depierro_si_sposani.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://fotogossip.tripod.com/carlasolaro/carla_solaro_antonello_depierro_si_sposani.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANTONELLO DE PIERRO E CARLA SOLARO SI SPOSANO <br />ANTONELLO DE PIERRO E CARLA SOLARO SI SPOSANO <br />Dopo essere stati beccati al mare in atteggiamenti ambigui, ecco che il direttore di Italymedia.it Antonello De Pierro e la nota attrice tintobrassiana Carla Solaro si sono sposati, e per convolare a giuste nozze hanno scelto Aosta, la citt natale di lei, con una festa per pochi intimi in un noto pub della citt alpina. Visto che la Solaro  stata la protagonista del Calendario Italymedia.it 2007 evidentemente il set fotografico fu galeotto. </p>
<p>Per vedere il servizio fotografico <br /><a href="http://fotogossip.tripod.com/carlasolaro/carla_solaro_antonello_depierro_si_sposani.htm" rel="nofollow">http://fotogossip.tripod.com/carlasolaro/carla_solaro_antonello_depierro_si_sposani.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherwin</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7215</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7215</guid>
		<description>You are acting like this is something new. &quot;In every major conference, at every major speech, sitting at tables in restaurants, there is going to be a blogger or podcaster with microphone, PDA, Videophone, laptop or paper and pencil in hand. Listening. Taking notes. That information is going to be transmitted to and from a blog entry and placed in the hands of “the readers”.&quot; ... Umm, reporters have been doing that for decades. And bloggers are already getting arrogant just like the traditional media. They experience a glimpse of power and influence and they are drunk instantly. Many of them ramble on as if they are brilliant and experts on every topic imaginable because some people read their opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are acting like this is something new. &#8220;In every major conference, at every major speech, sitting at tables in restaurants, there is going to be a blogger or podcaster with microphone, PDA, Videophone, laptop or paper and pencil in hand. Listening. Taking notes. That information is going to be transmitted to and from a blog entry and placed in the hands of “the readers”.&#8221; &#8230; Umm, reporters have been doing that for decades. </p>
<p>And bloggers are already getting arrogant just like the traditional media. They experience a glimpse of power and influence and they are drunk instantly. Many of them ramble on as if they are brilliant and experts on every topic imaginable because some people read their opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7216</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7216</guid>
		<description>I think it is the newest form of &quot;journalism.&quot;  Good or bad, like it or not, it is here to stay, until something else comes along.http://www.xtremeselfdefense.comhttp://www.xtremeselfdefense.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is the newest form of &#8220;journalism.&#8221;  Good or bad, like it or not, it is here to stay, until something else comes along.<br />
<a href="http://www.xtremeselfdefense.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.xtremeselfdefense.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.xtremeselfdefense.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.xtremeselfdefense.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farky</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7217</link>
		<dc:creator>Farky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7217</guid>
		<description>I think Mark&#039;s analysis is ok, but his characterization of bloggers as the new paparazzi is way off.  Like &quot;R&quot; said, the information these mass media organization dispence can be important, unlike what dessert Madonna might have had.  Therefore, any inaccuracies or biases that effect that information becomes important as well.  CBS/Rather&#039;s actions regarding those &quot;memos&quot; were despictable and in some ways the cover-up continues.  Same with Eason Jordan.  The blogosphere really only wanted the tape of the event.  What most people miss is that he made almost the exactly same comments 4 months ago (http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1355027,00.html). If an executive from a major news organization accuses US troops of murdering journalists, he needs evidence.  If he does so repeatedly without proof, that&#039;s news.  The fact that his organization thinks nothing of it and it&#039;s competitors choose not to report it does not bode well for lack of bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mark&#8217;s analysis is ok, but his characterization of bloggers as the new paparazzi is way off.  Like &#8220;R&#8221; said, the information these mass media organization dispence can be important, unlike what dessert Madonna might have had.  Therefore, any inaccuracies or biases that effect that information becomes important as well.  CBS/Rather&#8217;s actions regarding those &#8220;memos&#8221; were despictable and in some ways the cover-up continues.  Same with Eason Jordan.  The blogosphere really only wanted the tape of the event.  What most people miss is that he made almost the exactly same comments 4 months ago (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1355027,00.html)" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1355027,00.html)</a>. If an executive from a major news organization accuses US troops of murdering journalists, he needs evidence.  If he does so repeatedly without proof, that&#8217;s news.  The fact that his organization thinks nothing of it and it&#8217;s competitors choose not to report it does not bode well for lack of bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elias</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7218</link>
		<dc:creator>Elias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7218</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t get the Clooney/Britney Spears reference... could some please give me the 411?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get the Clooney/Britney Spears reference&#8230; could some please give me the 411?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primis</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>Primis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7219</guid>
		<description>Sorry Mark, you&#039;re off on this one.Calling political bloggers the media wave of the future is like calling the Weekly World News the same.  Facts bear little importance and even worse than wanting to make a name for themselves, every single one of these political blgogers are also trying to push a specific political left-wing or right-wing agenda.  And I find it incredibly-sad that there are that many people sitting in front of computers 12 hours a day waiting for some rumor to come up so they can feel important and somehow their existence be validated.Blogs are great for people to be able to spout off on and brief exchanges of idea.  But as far as actual credibility, I may as well go get my facts from the crazy drunk on the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Mark, you&#8217;re off on this one.</p>
<p>Calling political bloggers the media wave of the future is like calling the Weekly World News the same.  Facts bear little importance and even worse than wanting to make a name for themselves, every single one of these political blgogers are also trying to push a specific political left-wing or right-wing agenda.  And I find it incredibly-sad that there are that many people sitting in front of computers 12 hours a day waiting for some rumor to come up so they can feel important and somehow their existence be validated.</p>
<p>Blogs are great for people to be able to spout off on and brief exchanges of idea.  But as far as actual credibility, I may as well go get my facts from the crazy drunk on the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neo</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7220</link>
		<dc:creator>neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7220</guid>
		<description>good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JV</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator>JV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7221</guid>
		<description>Big time media can run but they can&#039;t hide.  Nice work Mark!  The problem is the media people are &quot;stars&quot; who get paid way too much money and they are way lazy.  Katie Couric makes $12 mil come on!!! She is not curing cancer. Now they all write books &amp; promote them on their TV shows.  They should have to pay for Ad time like the rest of the animals in the barn. In fact the more I watch anything on TV it just feels like one long sales pitch.  I don’t trust the MSM for news anymore either, it’s become so incestuous and everyone knows what happens when cousins marry.  It’s not good for the gene pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big time media can run but they can&#8217;t hide.  Nice work Mark!  The problem is the media people are &#8220;stars&#8221; who get paid way too much money and they are way lazy.  Katie Couric makes $12 mil come on!!! She is not curing cancer. Now they all write books &#038; promote them on their TV shows.  They should have to pay for Ad time like the rest of the animals in the barn. In fact the more I watch anything on TV it just feels like one long sales pitch.  I don’t trust the MSM for news anymore either, it’s become so incestuous and everyone knows what happens when cousins marry.  It’s not good for the gene pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JV</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7222</link>
		<dc:creator>JV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/political-bloggers-the-new-paparazzi/#comment-7222</guid>
		<description>Big time media can run but they can&#039;t hide.  Nice work Mark!  The problem is the media people are &quot;stars&quot; who get paid way too much money and they are way lazy.  Katie Couric makes $12 mil come on!!! She is not curing cancer. Now they all write books &amp; promote them on their TV shows.  They should have to pay for Ad time like the rest of the animals in the barn. In fact the more I watch anything on TV it just feels like one long sales pitch.  I don’t trust the MSM for news anymore either, it’s become so incestuous and everyone knows what happens when cousins marry.  It’s not good for the gene pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big time media can run but they can&#8217;t hide.  Nice work Mark!  The problem is the media people are &#8220;stars&#8221; who get paid way too much money and they are way lazy.  Katie Couric makes $12 mil come on!!! She is not curing cancer. Now they all write books &#038; promote them on their TV shows.  They should have to pay for Ad time like the rest of the animals in the barn. In fact the more I watch anything on TV it just feels like one long sales pitch.  I don’t trust the MSM for news anymore either, it’s become so incestuous and everyone knows what happens when cousins marry.  It’s not good for the gene pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
