Comments on: ABC should suspend Jim Gray until he apologizes

By: e mack

e mack — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:40:10 +0000

definetly , Jim Gray has dirt on somebody to keep getting hired for extremely bad reporting .

By: John Jax

John Jax — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

It would be funny if all the players from now on responded to Jim Gray sideline questions with: “Both teams played hard!” Eventually ABC would have to stop putting him on the air. Power to the players! Yeah Baby!!!

By: Ryan

Ryan — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

Amen, John Jax. I’ll refer you to post No. 54 in this thread, where I asserted that the players just ramble on about nonsense. They can say hi to their loved ones, or maybe talk about how much they love Rocky Road ice cream. No need to call Jim out or talk bad to him or about him. Let him do his job because the player is under no obligation to give a coherent answer.

By: Mike Didier

Mike Didier — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

Mark, still waiting for your answer: Is team chemistry better without Nash this year or not? Come on, you don’t seem like the type of guy who’s afraid to offend anyone with your true feelings. Mark, I never took you as a PC kind of guy, but maybe you are?

By: Clay Byrom

Clay Byrom — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

Mark Cuban,

Jim Gray is just an aggressive reporter doing his job by asking tough questions. You could learn some humility and be flattered that your team is pertinent enough to even receive probing questions from the national media. You did mess up losing Steve Nash, but you have been very fortunate concerning this up to this point. We’ll see how things go in the playoffs. Meanwhile, please don’t be so thin-skinned about actually being questioned about the loss of Steve Nash.

By: Hawkins

Hawkins — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

Cubes…dude…what’s the beef? Gray never mentioned your name and all he asked was if Dirk thought the team was better now even without Nash. Get over it man!

By: Adam

Adam — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

All Mark said in the interview on ESPN was that this was a better team without Nash. Of course, it is (different subject). But when he makes it sound like Nash wasn’t wanted here to Dirk (which happens to be Nash’s best friend) that’s where it gets messed up. chemistry didn’t get better when Nash left and that’s the bottomline of the argument.
(Antoine Walker was the culrit in that)

By: chris clare

chris clare — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

Did anyone see the Laker’s ESPN broadcast with closed captioning? During Cuban’s interview, the interviewer said somthing like “.. the Mavs have a lot if new faggs ..”, I guess the interviewer said “new faces”. Can’t these guys at least use a spell checker? Or was it a mistake …

By: Peter Russel

Peter Russel — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

Gray is a synonym for moron. Ask Jeff VanGundy about him. I remember in the last season after one game where Rockets won, Jeff refused to let Stevie francis to be interviewed by Gray.

By: Jim Gray

Jim Gray — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:02:05 +0000

Mark, I want to say that I apologize to you, the Mavs, and to the fans. I should not have asked Dirk what I did and try to make something out of nothing. I hope that even though this is short, you will forgive me.