Anyone who thinks that the US government, Yahoo, the CIA and anyone who finds his trolling irritating are all banded together in a massive conspiracy to defraud him of small amounts of money is obviously totally nuts.

To find out the truth about LOM talk to some of their clients or look at their actual track record. You will learn that they are a highly ethical and compliant organization that just happens to be offshore from the United States and is thus subjected to the usual barrage of scrutiny from authorities.

I didn’t realize Wikipedia could be edited and just checked to see what was said about me. Thus far, no problems.

As far as waging war with Mr. Weiss, I think there are better battles to be fought and I wish both of you would consider fighting them.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/CompanyFocus/BillionaireGoesMuckrakingForProfit.aspx

Or is michael bush somehow lying about this too. regardless of the critical/controversial nature of your sharesleuth.com site, I find it unethical and hope no one reads that site. it will simply line your already massive packets with readers paronoia about the market.

just my 2 cents,
a mavericks season ticket holder

On the one hand, I disagree with frontrunning negative pieces. Some would call that misappropriation. On the other hand, I’m amused by the twisted non-answers and clumsily tortured rhetoric of the ever-squirming ‘lil GW.

So this is actually the most amusing of both worlds. You have a stock-bashing site run by a billionaire, which I disagree with in both form as well as function (not in exposing crooks, but rather in trading ahead of the exposure, which I believe cheats the investors you sold your shares to, as you had info they weren’t in possession of – namely that you were about to publish a slam)…and you have an apologist for the worst elements of Wall Street, whose pollyanaish treatment of naked short selling ignores every speck of hard evidence secured via FOIA requests, and yet who has the nerve to bill himself as an exposer of Wall Street larceny (nuggets like “hedge funds aren’t for everyone” being an example of that rigorous and unflinching courage; as if most qualify for investing in them. Hey, ‘lilGW, should we also avoid Lambos, as they kind of suck, and stick to the 4 year old F-150? Thanks for the tip…).

It really is a classic slug-fest. Will Mark expose ‘lilGW as a pathological liar? Will ‘lilGW expose Mark as an ethically bankrupt miscreant?

Who’s working with the russian mob? Who’s in the pocket of hedge funds? Who can tell the difference any more?

I actually am willing to forego some of my habitual apathy on these topics and play along at home.

Now THAT’s show business!