<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I &#8220;Have it in for &#8221; Gootube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: life</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Mr. Cuban - these mega-corporations always target those that cannot fight back. The RIAA is using the judicial system in a manner where they are not for the good of the world; they are for the good of themselves, and they are just showing us \&#039;how strong we are\&#039;. There are a lot of wrongs in this world, but by adding more, you will NEVER achieve right]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Cuban &#8211; these mega-corporations always target those that cannot fight back. The RIAA is using the judicial system in a manner where they are not for the good of the world; they are for the good of themselves, and they are just showing us \&#8217;how strong we are\&#8217;. There are a lot of wrongs in this world, but by adding more, you will NEVER achieve right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DudeAsInCool</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DudeAsInCool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Build a technology that is user friendly, high quality and convenient, and people will download your content and be happy to pay a reasonable amount  of money for it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now let\&#039;s take a look at the entertainment industry.  What are their downloading sites?  Are they easy to use?   Is the product any good?  Are their prices reasonable for the product?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, no such site exists....  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The enteretainment business has no one to blame but themselves, because when other people build what the people want, they will come.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Build a technology that is user friendly, high quality and convenient, and people will download your content and be happy to pay a reasonable amount  of money for it.</p>
<p>Now let\&#8217;s take a look at the entertainment industry.  What are their downloading sites?  Are they easy to use?   Is the product any good?  Are their prices reasonable for the product?</p>
<p>Oh, no such site exists&#8230;.  </p>
<p>The enteretainment business has no one to blame but themselves, because when other people build what the people want, they will come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Brandon</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah 1080i... hah&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but anyways... i like when people point fingers at the man when THEY\&#039;RE the man themselves...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;christ.  want to help the little guy?  back my tiny IT company here in newport beach so i can one day have a blog with the same ideas as you (i think i see eye to eye with you a good 60% of the time) but the difference would be people would care, only because i had more money than i have right now.  you depress me mark..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah 1080i&#8230; hah</p>
<p>but anyways&#8230; i like when people point fingers at the man when THEY\&#8217;RE the man themselves&#8230;</p>
<p>christ.  want to help the little guy?  back my tiny IT company here in newport beach so i can one day have a blog with the same ideas as you (i think i see eye to eye with you a good 60% of the time) but the difference would be people would care, only because i had more money than i have right now.  you depress me mark..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Repas</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Repas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post. It seems that the trend on the web (for quite some time now) is to exploit the content of others in order to create a captive audience, monetize traffic, and when all is said and done - build a brand on the back of others. To me, there\&#039;s something that\&#039;s just not right about that. Honestly, when all is said and done, Google, including search (any many, many others) are nothing without the content of others. Content providers need to realize this and start taking advantage of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. It seems that the trend on the web (for quite some time now) is to exploit the content of others in order to create a captive audience, monetize traffic, and when all is said and done &#8211; build a brand on the back of others. To me, there\&#8217;s something that\&#8217;s just not right about that. Honestly, when all is said and done, Google, including search (any many, many others) are nothing without the content of others. Content providers need to realize this and start taking advantage of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Roark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I seriously appreciate you putting your money where your mouth is.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I\&#039;m getting really sick of all the digg/link bait going on out in the blogosphere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They really should just embrace copyright holders and allow more direct video purchases similar to iTunes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The sad thing is that in the midst of the copyright war the smaller artists are getting hurt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I seriously appreciate you putting your money where your mouth is.  </p>
<p>I\&#8217;m getting really sick of all the digg/link bait going on out in the blogosphere.</p>
<p>They really should just embrace copyright holders and allow more direct video purchases similar to iTunes.</p>
<p>The sad thing is that in the midst of the copyright war the smaller artists are getting hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mnstories.com/archives/2007/03/rerun_welcome_t.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mnstories.com/archives/2007/03/rerun_welcome_t.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the future.<br /><a href="http://www.mnstories.com/archives/2007/03/rerun_welcome_t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mnstories.com/archives/2007/03/rerun_welcome_t.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Buell</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Buell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried to keep an open mind when Google bought YouTube but Mark\&#039;s right.  This solution/service has really become poor since the acquisition.  I don\&#039;t even use it anymore...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to keep an open mind when Google bought YouTube but Mark\&#8217;s right.  This solution/service has really become poor since the acquisition.  I don\&#8217;t even use it anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula McClain</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula McClain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you on the piracy issue!  Living in Austin - there are a lot of \&quot;little guys\&quot; trying to \&quot;make it big\&quot;...these are the people who suffer from piracy online - they perform for the love of what they do - but they deserve to get paid too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on the piracy issue!  Living in Austin &#8211; there are a lot of \&#8221;little guys\&#8221; trying to \&#8221;make it big\&#8221;&#8230;these are the people who suffer from piracy online &#8211; they perform for the love of what they do &#8211; but they deserve to get paid too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Belshe</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Belshe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you prefer to not have the DMCA at all?  Youtube is not doing anything illegal.  The DMCA is very specific about what a service provider like Youtube should do.  I know you think Youtube should do more to police content before it is uploaded, but from a strictly legal perspective, Youtube is doing what our laws say it should do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In order to take this away from Youtube, you\&#039;d need to redo the DMCA, which could easily end up killing Yahoo, Hotmail, MySpace, Facebook, and a host of other sites which also have users uploading copyrighted material.  How would you rewrite the DMCA without nuking all these other companies?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know you think that it is easy to identify copyrighted material.  But it is not.  It\&#039;s very very hard.  I know it seems easy to search for \&quot;madonna\&quot;, but if you filter that, users will post it under \&quot;mad0nna\&quot; instead.  It\&#039;s a never ending stream of work.  I\&#039;m not saying that you shouldn\&#039;t try to filter this out, but the DMCA is clear that a service provider is not liable for the content posted by its users for good reason.&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you prefer to not have the DMCA at all?  Youtube is not doing anything illegal.  The DMCA is very specific about what a service provider like Youtube should do.  I know you think Youtube should do more to police content before it is uploaded, but from a strictly legal perspective, Youtube is doing what our laws say it should do.</p>
<p>In order to take this away from Youtube, you\&#8217;d need to redo the DMCA, which could easily end up killing Yahoo, Hotmail, MySpace, Facebook, and a host of other sites which also have users uploading copyrighted material.  How would you rewrite the DMCA without nuking all these other companies?</p>
<p>I know you think that it is easy to identify copyrighted material.  But it is not.  It\&#8217;s very very hard.  I know it seems easy to search for \&#8221;madonna\&#8221;, but if you filter that, users will post it under \&#8221;mad0nna\&#8221; instead.  It\&#8217;s a never ending stream of work.  I\&#8217;m not saying that you shouldn\&#8217;t try to filter this out, but the DMCA is clear that a service provider is not liable for the content posted by its users for good reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maui</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/why-i-have-it-in-for-gootube/#comment-29657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of people think that since this is a new medium, there are no rules.  Copy what you want.  View what you want.  Share what you want.  Even though it\&#039;s the wild west in certain ways, that doesn\&#039;t mean all copyright laws should go out the window.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of people think that since this is a new medium, there are no rules.  Copy what you want.  View what you want.  Share what you want.  Even though it\&#8217;s the wild west in certain ways, that doesn\&#8217;t mean all copyright laws should go out the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

