<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye Analog TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tw-product</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29867</link>
		<dc:creator>tw-product</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29867</guid>
		<description>I already watch entirely digital entertainment. Through YouTube.&lt;br&gt;Sorry Mark, no HDNET for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already watch entirely digital entertainment. Through YouTube.<br />Sorry Mark, no HDNET for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29866</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29866</guid>
		<description>Well if these changes in TV industry will make our life better - why not? Then we\&#039;ll say it with no regret -\&quot;Goodbye analog TV\&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if these changes in TV industry will make our life better &#8211; why not? Then we\&#8217;ll say it with no regret -\&#8221;Goodbye analog TV\&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Foster</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29865</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29865</guid>
		<description>As a reply to post #9 by superdave [I already watch entirely digital entertainment. Through YouTube.]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check out TubeSucker - YouTube Video Downloader and Media Player/Emailer System&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrad.com/software/tubesucker/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.newrad.com/software/tubesucker/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you like YouTube, you will love TubeSucker. It\&#039;s an entire system, downloader, internal database to store youtube links, and a built-in player/emailer that lets you run the whole thing at once. Plus it can download 8 videos at a time. Watching TV in the USA makes me want to throw up and then kill myself. It all looks like Nancy Grace self righteous hate spew parade. So that is why I bought TubeSucker. Everything I download is happy like the mexican tv channels. I\&#039;m watching bootlegs of long lost 70\&#039;s artists from youtube with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a reply to post #9 by superdave [I already watch entirely digital entertainment. Through YouTube.]</p>
<p>Check out TubeSucker &#8211; YouTube Video Downloader and Media Player/Emailer System</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newrad.com/software/tubesucker/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newrad.com/software/tubesucker/</a></p>
<p>If you like YouTube, you will love TubeSucker. It\&#8217;s an entire system, downloader, internal database to store youtube links, and a built-in player/emailer that lets you run the whole thing at once. Plus it can download 8 videos at a time. Watching TV in the USA makes me want to throw up and then kill myself. It all looks like Nancy Grace self righteous hate spew parade. So that is why I bought TubeSucker. Everything I download is happy like the mexican tv channels. I\&#8217;m watching bootlegs of long lost 70\&#8217;s artists from youtube with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luigibio</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29864</link>
		<dc:creator>luigibio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29864</guid>
		<description>Here in Italy there are still analog TV so, also for the newest LCD flat panel, you need to buy an external DV tuner (about 120$).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Italy there are still analog TV so, also for the newest LCD flat panel, you need to buy an external DV tuner (about 120$).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29863</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sizemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29863</guid>
		<description>If you don\&#039;t get HD Net or HD Net Movies, find a service that does and make the switch!  I switch when Time Warner took over, and have not looked back.  My HD Tuner is always on one of the two.  If you are a SIFI Geek, I\&#039;m getting Star Trek Enterprise in HD.  I can also watch good movies in HD for free.  Both channels are awesome.  Thanks Mark!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don\&#8217;t get HD Net or HD Net Movies, find a service that does and make the switch!  I switch when Time Warner took over, and have not looked back.  My HD Tuner is always on one of the two.  If you are a SIFI Geek, I\&#8217;m getting Star Trek Enterprise in HD.  I can also watch good movies in HD for free.  Both channels are awesome.  Thanks Mark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29862</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29862</guid>
		<description>Yes, Oisin, reading books are free.  There\&#039;s something called the library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Oisin, reading books are free.  There\&#8217;s something called the library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Reeder</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29861</link>
		<dc:creator>William Reeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29861</guid>
		<description>Pam, analog TV is what we\&#039;ve had since it was invented.  Digital TV is the new stuff.  But not all digital TV is high definition (HD).  In fact, most probably isn\&#039;t.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the selling points of digital TV was that the TV stations could squeeze several standard definition (SD) TV \&quot;channels\&quot; into the same space as a single analog signal.  Your local ABC affiliate was salivating over the ability to offer several channels -- hoping that you\&#039;d ultimately spend more time on their channels and help earn them more advertising revenue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don\&#039;t think it will end up that way, though, because all that\&#039;s happening is that all 5 or so of my local stations are fighting to show the same syndicated content or to create special interest (read: low viewership) channels.  So they\&#039;re really just taking viewers away from their flagship station and devaluing the advertising on that station with little added value on the newer channels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ultimately, I think that there are two choices: very low video quality (think \&quot;GooTube\&quot; as Mr. Cuban likes to call it), and HD.  I think low quality will go to the internet and HD will stay on TV.  Unless someone can figure out how to properly create the mythical merged system.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam, analog TV is what we\&#8217;ve had since it was invented.  Digital TV is the new stuff.  But not all digital TV is high definition (HD).  In fact, most probably isn\&#8217;t.</p>
<p>One of the selling points of digital TV was that the TV stations could squeeze several standard definition (SD) TV \&#8221;channels\&#8221; into the same space as a single analog signal.  Your local ABC affiliate was salivating over the ability to offer several channels &#8212; hoping that you\&#8217;d ultimately spend more time on their channels and help earn them more advertising revenue.</p>
<p>I don\&#8217;t think it will end up that way, though, because all that\&#8217;s happening is that all 5 or so of my local stations are fighting to show the same syndicated content or to create special interest (read: low viewership) channels.  So they\&#8217;re really just taking viewers away from their flagship station and devaluing the advertising on that station with little added value on the newer channels.</p>
<p>Ultimately, I think that there are two choices: very low video quality (think \&#8221;GooTube\&#8221; as Mr. Cuban likes to call it), and HD.  I think low quality will go to the internet and HD will stay on TV.  Unless someone can figure out how to properly create the mythical merged system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parry</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29860</link>
		<dc:creator>Parry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29860</guid>
		<description>You may be interested in this Mark - in the UK, it was announced yesterday that they are completely shutting off analog signals in a western region, population 25k, 73% of whom are already digital (UK average is 79%).  This is to be followed by a region-by-region rollout of this policy, with a view to totally abolish analog across the entire country by 2012.  Full story can be read here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6453967.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6453967.stm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And here\&#039;s a bit of trivia: the city where this initiative is starting, Whitehaven, is the birthplace of Mildred Gale, grandmother of George Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be interested in this Mark &#8211; in the UK, it was announced yesterday that they are completely shutting off analog signals in a western region, population 25k, 73% of whom are already digital (UK average is 79%).  This is to be followed by a region-by-region rollout of this policy, with a view to totally abolish analog across the entire country by 2012.  Full story can be read here: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6453967.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6453967.stm</a></p>
<p>And here\&#8217;s a bit of trivia: the city where this initiative is starting, Whitehaven, is the birthplace of Mildred Gale, grandmother of George Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29859</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29859</guid>
		<description>hey Oisin, ever heard of a library? Most of them have far more books that you could read in a lifetime --all for free.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, it\&#039;s a joke. When did bloggers lose their senses of humor?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I basically just wanted a way to include talking about HDTV, bash Mark Cuban for no particular reason (I\&#039;m a fan actually), and say Go Bulls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Oisin, ever heard of a library? Most of them have far more books that you could read in a lifetime &#8211;all for free.</p>
<p>Besides, it\&#8217;s a joke. When did bloggers lose their senses of humor?</p>
<p>I basically just wanted a way to include talking about HDTV, bash Mark Cuban for no particular reason (I\&#8217;m a fan actually), and say Go Bulls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiptoe</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29858</link>
		<dc:creator>tiptoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/goodbye-analog-tv/#comment-29858</guid>
		<description>The notion of all HD has been around solidly since at least the mid 1990\&#039;s.  I went to a summit about it at a PBS station.  Has lots of capabilities like being interactive.  I\&#039;ll do built-in HD next time around which should be sooner than later. Built-in makes more sense.&lt;br&gt;tt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion of all HD has been around solidly since at least the mid 1990\&#8217;s.  I went to a summit about it at a PBS station.  Has lots of capabilities like being interactive.  I\&#8217;ll do built-in HD next time around which should be sooner than later. Built-in makes more sense.<br />tt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
