Comments on: IntraNets vs InterNets http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/ the mark cuban weblog Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:04:09 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Andrey http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33446 Andrey Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:35:51 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33446 Too much Youtube nonsense taking up too much bandwidth. Growth of file sharing - bandwidth eating sources - clearly growing at at a better clip than the technology supporting it. Too much Youtube nonsense taking up too much bandwidth. Growth of file sharing – bandwidth eating sources – clearly growing at at a better clip than the technology supporting it.

]]> By: Kansas City Realtors http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33445 Kansas City Realtors Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:22:27 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33445 I contacted Google about this and they said they are in the process of buying the internet from Al Gore and that we have nothing to worry about. I contacted Google about this and they said they are in the process of buying the internet from Al Gore and that we have nothing to worry about.

]]> By: Ana Yoerg http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33444 Ana Yoerg Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:06:34 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33444 URL for Comment below: <a href="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-content/intranet-managers-dont-lose-hope-001646.php?r=a6" rel="nofollow">http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-content/intranet-managers-dont-lose-hope-001646.php?r=a6</a> URL for Comment below: http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-content/intranet-managers-dont-lose-hope-001646.php?r=a6

]]> By: Ana Yoerg http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33443 Ana Yoerg Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:04:45 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33443 Check out Gerry McGovern\'s article on CMSWire inspirationally entitled, Intranet Managers, Don\'t Lose Hope.<br>He gives some good advice for managers who may be getting discouraged by all the intranet bashing going on these days! Check out Gerry McGovern\’s article on CMSWire inspirationally entitled, Intranet Managers, Don\’t Lose Hope.
He gives some good advice for managers who may be getting discouraged by all the intranet bashing going on these days!

]]> By: Mark Kendrick http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33428 Mark Kendrick Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:34:48 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33428 Mark,<br><br>www.austinmlb.com YES! Check it out. Austin needs you Mark, I\'ve taken the time to make my case to you in a website that I have made. Check it out and then all you need to do is buy some crappy team and bring it here and make them good. That is if the Cubs thing doesn\'t work out ;)<br><br>I\'m not asking for free tickets or anything. I just love baseball and think it\'s time Austin got a team. <br>Regards,<br><br>Mark Mark,

http://www.austinmlb.com YES! Check it out. Austin needs you Mark, I\’ve taken the time to make my case to you in a website that I have made. Check it out and then all you need to do is buy some crappy team and bring it here and make them good. That is if the Cubs thing doesn\’t work out ;)

I\’m not asking for free tickets or anything. I just love baseball and think it\’s time Austin got a team.
Regards,

Mark

]]> By: File storage http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33442 File storage Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:48:09 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33442 In 5 years everyone will be downloading their multi-media and apps-on-demand; there will be no need for cable feed movies, TV or Phone. You will need this subscription revenue as most ad revenue will be diluted by digital recorders and the coming auto-elimination of advertisements. In 5 years everyone will be downloading their multi-media and apps-on-demand; there will be no need for cable feed movies, TV or Phone. You will need this subscription revenue as most ad revenue will be diluted by digital recorders and the coming auto-elimination of advertisements.

]]> By: Tim Connolly http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33441 Tim Connolly Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:17:08 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33441 I think we need to increase the speed of light. This will allow photons, electrons and maybe even packets to travel faster. We will redefine \'wire-speed\'.<br><br>It could work ;)<br><br>PS: I\'m not responsible for making sure its fast... I think we need to increase the speed of light. This will allow photons, electrons and maybe even packets to travel faster. We will redefine \’wire-speed\’.

It could work ;)

PS: I\’m not responsible for making sure its fast…

]]> By: Joe http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33440 Joe Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:37:57 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33440 Why do you think the big G is buying up dark fiber and trying to put data-centers in shipping containers. Why do you think the big G is buying up dark fiber and trying to put data-centers in shipping containers.

]]> By: Nick Jones http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33439 Nick Jones Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:26:11 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33439 I am very interested in getting into this more with Mark and the writers on his Blog as my project involves bandwidth, eyeballs and the ability to ramp up the capacity to receive a lot of hits. That is assuming I can get a simple message web site up and quickly and succinctly tell the story of StormfuryRevisited. I got busy so this site is NOT up yet.<br><br>It sounds like from Marks comments having the servers at a specific place on the web or from a particular vendor can be critical. You dont want to come up with a killer web site-home pagequickly gets hits, attention and maybe donations and then have the Internet seize up on you!<br><br>So what is StormfuryRevisited? Its Stormfury re-done on Guam where it should have been done in the first place. It is to confirm the governments $100 M investment in the project and do it with private money. [Not Marks but he can sure help out with this Web stuff] <br><br>So, why do we think that Stormfury worked? Well for starters, did the government invent the light bulb or drill oil wells? Noin fact it was left to people like Howard Hughes fatherto invent a special drill bit that became the Tool Co. fortune. More details to followthe short of it is I flew Typhoon and Hurricane reconn. I have been in the eye of many hurricanes and typhoonsand I am currently, right now, controlling the weather.<br><br>It is not just cloud seeding anymore, it is high science backed by NCAR the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Which weather can we control? That would be the pretty cloudsthe ones with the billowy sharp edges like giant breasts filled with milk to quote a line from the Aviator. <br><br>A hurricane or a typhoon will be a lot tougher, because just like the recent movie on the subject its all about the super cooled water. <br><br>Back to the original topic, wellits all about the Web. The web has to be used as a tool to sell this idea to the Japanese and the Chinese, as they are a very important key. We have to find a few Heroes out there who will help with the processbut bandwidth is going to be the major key. <br><br>NickNWS 1966-1982, Typhoon Trackers 1969-1970, Hurricane Hunters 1976-1982<br> I am very interested in getting into this more with Mark and the writers on his Blog as my project involves bandwidth, eyeballs and the ability to ramp up the capacity to receive a lot of hits. That is assuming I can get a simple message web site up and quickly and succinctly tell the story of StormfuryRevisited. I got busy so this site is NOT up yet.

It sounds like from Marks comments having the servers at a specific place on the web or from a particular vendor can be critical. You dont want to come up with a killer web site-home pagequickly gets hits, attention and maybe donations and then have the Internet seize up on you!

So what is StormfuryRevisited? Its Stormfury re-done on Guam where it should have been done in the first place. It is to confirm the governments $100 M investment in the project and do it with private money. [Not Marks but he can sure help out with this Web stuff]

So, why do we think that Stormfury worked? Well for starters, did the government invent the light bulb or drill oil wells? Noin fact it was left to people like Howard Hughes fatherto invent a special drill bit that became the Tool Co. fortune. More details to followthe short of it is I flew Typhoon and Hurricane reconn. I have been in the eye of many hurricanes and typhoonsand I am currently, right now, controlling the weather.

It is not just cloud seeding anymore, it is high science backed by NCAR the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Which weather can we control? That would be the pretty cloudsthe ones with the billowy sharp edges like giant breasts filled with milk to quote a line from the Aviator.

A hurricane or a typhoon will be a lot tougher, because just like the recent movie on the subject its all about the super cooled water.

Back to the original topic, wellits all about the Web. The web has to be used as a tool to sell this idea to the Japanese and the Chinese, as they are a very important key. We have to find a few Heroes out there who will help with the processbut bandwidth is going to be the major key.

NickNWS 1966-1982, Typhoon Trackers 1969-1970, Hurricane Hunters 1976-1982

]]> By: Zim http://blogmaverick.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33438 Zim Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:56:56 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/intranets-vs-internets/#comment-33438 An interesting article was written in the NY Times today about this situation. A lot of companies: Netflix, Joost, ReelTime, Limelight, etc are banking that they can bend the current infrastructure to meet their needs. It will be interesting to see who is right.<br><br><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/06/business/media/06stream.html?ref=technology" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/06/business/media/06stream.html?ref=technology</a> An interesting article was written in the NY Times today about this situation. A lot of companies: Netflix, Joost, ReelTime, Limelight, etc are banking that they can bend the current infrastructure to meet their needs. It will be interesting to see who is right.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/06/business/media/06stream.html?ref=technology

]]>