<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Tries to Get Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Tallabas</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41072</link>
		<dc:creator>George Tallabas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41072</guid>
		<description>I heard the other day on the news that AT&amp;T is spending billions of dollars to expand the internet bandwidth that sites like YouTube is deavouring.  The news release said that if AT&amp;T did nothing the internet as we know it would cease to exist in 2 years.  Did Google even think about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the other day on the news that AT&#038;T is spending billions of dollars to expand the internet bandwidth that sites like YouTube is deavouring.  The news release said that if AT&#038;T did nothing the internet as we know it would cease to exist in 2 years.  Did Google even think about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novak Djokovic Tennis</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41059</link>
		<dc:creator>Novak Djokovic Tennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41059</guid>
		<description>If YouTube tries to get legal, in what situation it is right now!? This is a quote from DP Forums: \&#039;Youtube is allowed under a law that says that they cannot regulate all user-submitted content. If youtube gets a complaint, they are legally required by law to remove the video if it is in copyright violation.\&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If YouTube tries to get legal, in what situation it is right now!? This is a quote from DP Forums: \&#8217;Youtube is allowed under a law that says that they cannot regulate all user-submitted content. If youtube gets a complaint, they are legally required by law to remove the video if it is in copyright violation.\&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merrell</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41057</link>
		<dc:creator>Merrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41057</guid>
		<description>I have read it somewhere that Youtube consumed bandwidth equal to the bandwidth used by whole internet in 2000. If that true, then that is really insane. I think we will see huge bandwidth fees on Youtube by Network provides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read it somewhere that Youtube consumed bandwidth equal to the bandwidth used by whole internet in 2000. If that true, then that is really insane. I think we will see huge bandwidth fees on Youtube by Network provides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynne</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41056</link>
		<dc:creator>lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41056</guid>
		<description>This is more of a response to no knowing what to do with youtube and how to make money. I think the opposite in that youtube is perfect for generating traffic for any company. It is apparent that youtube videos esp. on your site can lead to a noticeable increase in traffic considering google does own it...they will rank you better if you use their services. Youtube is the 8th largest site in the U.S. and people (what 33 years is the average) are spending more time on youtube than watching tv. Google knows what they bought and how they are making money off of it and companies should no overlook the benefit that is provided by this simple solution for more business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is more of a response to no knowing what to do with youtube and how to make money. I think the opposite in that youtube is perfect for generating traffic for any company. It is apparent that youtube videos esp. on your site can lead to a noticeable increase in traffic considering google does own it&#8230;they will rank you better if you use their services. Youtube is the 8th largest site in the U.S. and people (what 33 years is the average) are spending more time on youtube than watching tv. Google knows what they bought and how they are making money off of it and companies should no overlook the benefit that is provided by this simple solution for more business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41055</link>
		<dc:creator>PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41055</guid>
		<description>Mark. Your blog is the best. Im here everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark. Your blog is the best. Im here everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolshine</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41044</link>
		<dc:creator>coolshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41044</guid>
		<description>I am a fresher in this blog.Is anyone live in Beijing in our blog.I hope make friends with you .In order to improve our oral English ,and is anyone know where could I brought the Original foreign-language books in Beijing? Thankyou!!     koosshine@163.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a fresher in this blog.Is anyone live in Beijing in our blog.I hope make friends with you .In order to improve our oral English ,and is anyone know where could I brought the Original foreign-language books in Beijing? Thankyou!!     <a href="mailto:koosshine@163.com">koosshine@163.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim price</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41054</link>
		<dc:creator>tim price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41054</guid>
		<description>GO MAVS GO. BEST OF LUCK TO MARK CUBAN AND THE MAVS.!&lt;br&gt;I AM NOT A BASKETBALL FAN BUT I DO SUPPORT ANYONE FROM OLD PITTSBURGH AREA!  AND SINCE I AM IN AMARILLO , TEXAS NOW, WHY NOW! GO MAVS GO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO MAVS GO. BEST OF LUCK TO MARK CUBAN AND THE MAVS.!<br />I AM NOT A BASKETBALL FAN BUT I DO SUPPORT ANYONE FROM OLD PITTSBURGH AREA!  AND SINCE I AM IN AMARILLO , TEXAS NOW, WHY NOW! GO MAVS GO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chance</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41053</link>
		<dc:creator>Chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41053</guid>
		<description>I\&#039;ve always looked at the purchase of Youtube as an investment in the top brand for video content on the internet, coupled with the hedge that bandwidth costs will go down even as bandwidth for the consumer goes up. Ten years down the road Youtube will look much different: higher quality, better integration into the web, content sent directly to everything from your TV to your phone (happening already, albeit in a cludgy way), and a breakdown of barriers between different formats of content (TV and internet, for example). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only real constraint we have, from a technological point of view, is bandwidth. That will be fixed very soon, maybe in the next 10-20 years (other countries are way ahead of us on that front, Singapore for example). As bandwidth increases, viewing HD and other high-quality content becomes trivial. And Youtube is THE best brand out there for online video content (in the minds of users). Far from a fatal decision by Google, it may be one of the most savvy, far-sighted business decisions in history. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We are visual creatures in the process of moving all intellectual capital onto the Internet. Youtube is the gatekeeper to that visual content, at least in video form, in most consumers\&#039; minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;ve always looked at the purchase of Youtube as an investment in the top brand for video content on the internet, coupled with the hedge that bandwidth costs will go down even as bandwidth for the consumer goes up. Ten years down the road Youtube will look much different: higher quality, better integration into the web, content sent directly to everything from your TV to your phone (happening already, albeit in a cludgy way), and a breakdown of barriers between different formats of content (TV and internet, for example). </p>
<p>The only real constraint we have, from a technological point of view, is bandwidth. That will be fixed very soon, maybe in the next 10-20 years (other countries are way ahead of us on that front, Singapore for example). As bandwidth increases, viewing HD and other high-quality content becomes trivial. And Youtube is THE best brand out there for online video content (in the minds of users). Far from a fatal decision by Google, it may be one of the most savvy, far-sighted business decisions in history. </p>
<p>We are visual creatures in the process of moving all intellectual capital onto the Internet. Youtube is the gatekeeper to that visual content, at least in video form, in most consumers\&#8217; minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mont Tremblant Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41051</link>
		<dc:creator>Mont Tremblant Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41051</guid>
		<description>Great writing but in my opinion, MS wont move, they don\&#039;t seem to get the whole Internet thing and of course video content website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great writing but in my opinion, MS wont move, they don\&#8217;t seem to get the whole Internet thing and of course video content website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41047</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/youtube-tries-to-get-legal/#comment-41047</guid>
		<description>I\&#039;m still not sure that Google knows what to do with YouTube.  It would be compared with Microsoft buying a share in FaceBook. Nobody is quite sure how to make money, but they\&#039;re willing to spend whatever it takes to purchase the sites audience incase they ever do come up with a plan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;m still not sure that Google knows what to do with YouTube.  It would be compared with Microsoft buying a share in FaceBook. Nobody is quite sure how to make money, but they\&#8217;re willing to spend whatever it takes to purchase the sites audience incase they ever do come up with a plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
