<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Video vs Digital TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Can YouTube even handle movies? &#8212; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-52897</link>
		<dc:creator>Can YouTube even handle movies? &#8212; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-52897</guid>
		<description>[...] has written a lot about doing &#8220;real&#8221; video over the Internet, and doesn&#8217;t think it&#8217;s even worth bothering.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has written a lot about doing &#8220;real&#8221; video over the Internet, and doesn&#8217;t think it&#8217;s even worth bothering.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Porter</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41390</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41390</guid>
		<description>Mark,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you may be underestimating the current capabilities that are out there. I\&#039;ll be admit that I\&#039;m a little dorkier than the average person when it comes to home electronics and am willing to but some time into my setup. Right now I am able to download HD content (movies(9-12gb)) to my home PC server over the internet using newsgroups. This fully saturates my Comcast connection at 3.5mbps and is encrypted using SSL. I can stream it over a wired LAN(while still downloading) to a souped-up laptop (I am lucky enough to have a high end laptop from work, but devices such as SageTV media extender could do the trick) and from there to HDMI and surround sound. Sure I only get a couple movie\\shows a day but who has time for than much content anyways? Of course this isn\&#039;t very \&#039;on demand\&#039; but with a days notice I can have a movie which beats Netflix. And I can store it forever on a hard drive. I of course still have Netflix for hard to find stuff but went from 20-5$ a month there and now pay $30\\month for giganews. I know people who have 30mbps residential FIOS service which theoretically could speed things up to download an hour of HD content in less than an hour.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My question is: when will the media companies offer a competitive service? Sure it will take 3-5 years to mature but why wait? It would sure take the hassle out of dealing with the cable companies or at least give leverage in negotiating with them. I would gladly take my money there if they offered a similar capability. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I think you may be underestimating the current capabilities that are out there. I\&#8217;ll be admit that I\&#8217;m a little dorkier than the average person when it comes to home electronics and am willing to but some time into my setup. Right now I am able to download HD content (movies(9-12gb)) to my home PC server over the internet using newsgroups. This fully saturates my Comcast connection at 3.5mbps and is encrypted using SSL. I can stream it over a wired LAN(while still downloading) to a souped-up laptop (I am lucky enough to have a high end laptop from work, but devices such as SageTV media extender could do the trick) and from there to HDMI and surround sound. Sure I only get a couple movie\\shows a day but who has time for than much content anyways? Of course this isn\&#8217;t very \&#8217;on demand\&#8217; but with a days notice I can have a movie which beats Netflix. And I can store it forever on a hard drive. I of course still have Netflix for hard to find stuff but went from 20-5$ a month there and now pay $30\\month for giganews. I know people who have 30mbps residential FIOS service which theoretically could speed things up to download an hour of HD content in less than an hour.</p>
<p>My question is: when will the media companies offer a competitive service? Sure it will take 3-5 years to mature but why wait? It would sure take the hassle out of dealing with the cable companies or at least give leverage in negotiating with them. I would gladly take my money there if they offered a similar capability. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>&#8211;Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Martens</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41389</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Martens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41389</guid>
		<description>Video is the rapid emergent technology in the field of real estate.  I attended a technology conference (REtechSouth.com) recently and during one panel it was mentioned that Google will soon be including the usage of video into its algorithms for ranking websites.  The days of the Realtor who wears multiple hats is getting more complex as technology advances...a Realtor now must, know the market, be a salesman, administrator, be a marketer, a photographer, a videographer, amongst other roles as well.  The days of the \&quot;part-time\&quot; Realtor are no more...with a slowing economy the professionals are what remains and yet these professionals are finding themselves juggling all the duties they must adhere to with all of the new technology being released.  Check out www.wellcomemat.com they are specific to real estate, but the quality and distribution of their videos is great.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a businessman too you ought to look into investing in softRealty.com a new IDX provider in the Atlanta area that is looking for investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video is the rapid emergent technology in the field of real estate.  I attended a technology conference (REtechSouth.com) recently and during one panel it was mentioned that Google will soon be including the usage of video into its algorithms for ranking websites.  The days of the Realtor who wears multiple hats is getting more complex as technology advances&#8230;a Realtor now must, know the market, be a salesman, administrator, be a marketer, a photographer, a videographer, amongst other roles as well.  The days of the \&#8221;part-time\&#8221; Realtor are no more&#8230;with a slowing economy the professionals are what remains and yet these professionals are finding themselves juggling all the duties they must adhere to with all of the new technology being released.  Check out <a href="http://www.wellcomemat.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wellcomemat.com</a> they are specific to real estate, but the quality and distribution of their videos is great.</p>
<p>As a businessman too you ought to look into investing in softRealty.com a new IDX provider in the Atlanta area that is looking for investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tisner</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41388</link>
		<dc:creator>Tisner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41388</guid>
		<description>There are two options:&lt;br&gt;A watch regular broadcasting on their schedule&lt;br&gt;or B watch regular broadcasting on mine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tivo helped somewhat to fix this to opt. B&lt;br&gt;and the handhelds will also help us get information when we want it..think the tv networks are getting the picture just by offering programing to watch online they realize information is heading in a new direction.  Investors want the same options online when they decide what choices they want that is why we offer plenty at &lt;a href=&quot;http://orlandoavenue.com/investor.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://orlandoavenue.com/investor.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now we just need to address how this all will look on handheld asap like the networks information is finding alot of new ways to present itself we can chose when and where.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two options:<br />A watch regular broadcasting on their schedule<br />or B watch regular broadcasting on mine.</p>
<p>Tivo helped somewhat to fix this to opt. B<br />and the handhelds will also help us get information when we want it..think the tv networks are getting the picture just by offering programing to watch online they realize information is heading in a new direction.  Investors want the same options online when they decide what choices they want that is why we offer plenty at <a href="http://orlandoavenue.com/investor.htm" rel="nofollow">http://orlandoavenue.com/investor.htm</a></p>
<p>Now we just need to address how this all will look on handheld asap like the networks information is finding alot of new ways to present itself we can chose when and where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darryl</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41387</link>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41387</guid>
		<description>Televison has the same challeges that music, newspaper, radio, and movies have.  They must adapt, embrace the net or die. The net is the future of all media. It\&#039;s the best platform.  And it\&#039;s boundries have no limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Televison has the same challeges that music, newspaper, radio, and movies have.  They must adapt, embrace the net or die. The net is the future of all media. It\&#8217;s the best platform.  And it\&#8217;s boundries have no limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41386</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41386</guid>
		<description>\&quot;Why ? Because its a stable, deterministic platform.\&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Back in the mid-to-late nineties, they used the same argument to talk down Ethernet and IP in the world of industrial control (e.g. automated production lines, high speed printing presses, and, in my particular experience, entertainment automation).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many customers were told that they could only solve their problem of predictable delivery (in this case of control messages - stop, start, go faster etc.) using deterministic networks such as Profibus, CANbus, RS485.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nowadays (and for some years now), that argument doesn\&#039;t hold any water any more. Mainstream and highly reputable engineering firms, such as Siemens and the like, have solved the problem using Ethernet and IP with their inherently non-deterministic approaches. Even using WiFi.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see no reason to assume that the same won\&#039;t play out for Internet TV. The advantages of a standards-based protocol such as IP are simply too great to resist in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>\&#8221;Why ? Because its a stable, deterministic platform.\&#8221;</p>
<p>Back in the mid-to-late nineties, they used the same argument to talk down Ethernet and IP in the world of industrial control (e.g. automated production lines, high speed printing presses, and, in my particular experience, entertainment automation).</p>
<p>Many customers were told that they could only solve their problem of predictable delivery (in this case of control messages &#8211; stop, start, go faster etc.) using deterministic networks such as Profibus, CANbus, RS485.</p>
<p>Nowadays (and for some years now), that argument doesn\&#8217;t hold any water any more. Mainstream and highly reputable engineering firms, such as Siemens and the like, have solved the problem using Ethernet and IP with their inherently non-deterministic approaches. Even using WiFi.</p>
<p>I see no reason to assume that the same won\&#8217;t play out for Internet TV. The advantages of a standards-based protocol such as IP are simply too great to resist in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darryl</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41384</link>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41384</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/interactive/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003728947&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/interactive/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003728947&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Traditional ways of broadcasting video cannot measure up to the internet\&#039;s flexibilty. That\&#039;s why I believe the internet will win.  CBS could never broadcast  the entire NCAA Men\&#039;s Tourney via old media.  What about the Olympics?  I think future media will become more interactive and enhance our way of veiwing programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/interactive/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003728947" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/interactive/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003728947</a></p>
<p>Traditional ways of broadcasting video cannot measure up to the internet\&#8217;s flexibilty. That\&#8217;s why I believe the internet will win.  CBS could never broadcast  the entire NCAA Men\&#8217;s Tourney via old media.  What about the Olympics?  I think future media will become more interactive and enhance our way of veiwing programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Doerksen</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41363</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Doerksen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41363</guid>
		<description>The incumbents (cable, satellite, telephone, and broadcasters) guard the front door to the living room. The newcomers DVD retail, set-top box, ICT, web, mobile keep knocking on the back door. The newcomers are nimble, the early adopter and early majority want to do business with them. The incumbents are clumsy, they make expensive mistakes that drives the early majority (moving towards the late majority) to the newcomers. The more mistakes, and boy the incumbents are good for a lot of mistakes, the more the majority looks around. Yes, we know where the money is today. But do you know where the back door to the living room is? There is technology to built, business models to build, and money to be made. Best effort is good enough for a growing number of people, just like the Datsun was - now #2 automaker in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The incumbents (cable, satellite, telephone, and broadcasters) guard the front door to the living room. The newcomers DVD retail, set-top box, ICT, web, mobile keep knocking on the back door. The newcomers are nimble, the early adopter and early majority want to do business with them. The incumbents are clumsy, they make expensive mistakes that drives the early majority (moving towards the late majority) to the newcomers. The more mistakes, and boy the incumbents are good for a lot of mistakes, the more the majority looks around. Yes, we know where the money is today. But do you know where the back door to the living room is? There is technology to built, business models to build, and money to be made. Best effort is good enough for a growing number of people, just like the Datsun was &#8211; now #2 automaker in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cenell D. Harrell</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41383</link>
		<dc:creator>Cenell D. Harrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41383</guid>
		<description>Since social networking sites has saturated the internet, what is the next big thing for users, is internet T.V or Digital T.V next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since social networking sites has saturated the internet, what is the next big thing for users, is internet T.V or Digital T.V next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41376</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/internet-video-vs-digital-tv/#comment-41376</guid>
		<description>I agree totally with bt. Convergence: bring it on and who cares which network. Connect many networks and they become one. This, by the way, applies to the old boy network too.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally with bt. Convergence: bring it on and who cares which network. Connect many networks and they become one. This, by the way, applies to the old boy network too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
