Comments on: Why McCain Was Right to Postpone His Campaign

By: gcedwards

gcedwards — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:16:29 +0000

You have a good point although the truthfulness of that assertion doesn’t apply in this situation. Obama was well aware of what was going on months before things got bad, McCain was in denial about the state of the economy. I believe McCain was grand standing. As we have witnessed over the course of these past few weeks that all the talks and meeting still have not offered any real insight into what it is going to take to get us out of this crisis. Obama has been clear all along stating middle lass jobs are the only way to restore the economy.

By: Jeff Hock

Jeff Hock — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:27:45 +0000

I don’t think it was an issue of right or wrong. I saw
his 48 hour postponement for what it was, a ploy to get
out of debating while earning him points for being on top
of domestic issues.

By: Wes Shipman

Wes Shipman — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:00:36 +0000

Every one bad mouths McCain,what about all Obamas tie to radical groups,his ties to his radical preacher of 20 years.What about Obama and the Acorn group,they all blow over these very critical things.Thanks

By: Josh Smith

Josh Smith — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:47:25 +0000

I guess this discussion is over…

By: Josh Smith

Josh Smith — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:09:08 +0000

McCain apologists, check this out: http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters

By: Josh Smith

Josh Smith — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:51:17 +0000

Hey Carol, I guess you didn’t see that McCain’s only contribution to the proceedings was suggesting an alternative proposal that included much more tax breaks for oil companies. That’s not the way to protect Americans, now is it?

By: Carol MacPhail

Carol MacPhail — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:39:54 +0000

It was imperative that the presential candidates be involved in the process; at least, if nothing else, be present to hear the proposal. Obama talks like he wrote the proposal which does not protect main street Americans enough. The Democrats already tried to attach extra pork to the first proposal. The people need protection, the mortgages to those who could not afford them should never have happened and the regulations should be changed to prevent these types of mortgages from happening. You don’t get something for nothing…save…not everyone will EARN enough to have a house…it’s always been that way. Wall Street should not be bailed out…maybe helped out, and those making money off the backs of Americans should pay up, be penalized, lose their jobs, etc. Comeon…making $94,000 in 6 yrs…excessive. And Obama is the number two receipient of support money from these people.

By: Josh

Josh — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:05:05 +0000

oh really digito? care to explain exactly what mccain accomplished? care to explain why they actually both met with the officials and bush, yet mccain made a big deal about suspending his campaign, while obama managed to walk and chew gum at the same time? care to pony up to the fact that the bailout was voted DOWN after mccain mavericked on up? you’re a fool and so is cubes.

By: Digito Society » Blog Archive » On Being There vs. On Being Where?

Digito Society » Blog Archive » On Being There vs. On Being Where? — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:24:36 +0000

[...] Cuban nails the difference between McCain and Obama: Being there vs. being where? [...]

By: film izle

film izle — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:20:53 +0000

I usually agree with you but not this time.