Comments on: SEC P2 http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/ the mark cuban weblog Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:04:09 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon) http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55399 Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon) Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:12:29 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55399 To Mark Cuban: A word of advice from someone who has been litigated by the SEC on far more substantial matters: Don't try your case in public. If your attorneys disagree with me, you are respectfully advised to find new attorneys. Note: I am not commenting (at least at this time) about the relative merits of your case. Respectfully, Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon) To Mark Cuban:

A word of advice from someone who has been litigated by the SEC on far more substantial matters:

Don’t try your case in public. If your attorneys disagree with me, you are respectfully advised to find new attorneys.

Note: I am not commenting (at least at this time) about the relative merits of your case.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon)

]]> By: Your Daddy http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55157 Your Daddy Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:55:10 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55157 Why does by blog comment get deleted every time I post? 3 time and counting.... What kind of network nazi's do we have here? A former mavs fan, Wild Man Wiley Why does by blog comment get deleted every time I post? 3 time and counting….

What kind of network nazi’s do we have here?

A former mavs fan,

Wild Man Wiley

]]> By: Dan http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55097 Dan Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:01:35 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55097 Go Mark! We at LibertyManiacs.com are fully behind you and are slapping on our <a> href="http://www.zazzle.com/free_mark_cuban_bumper_sticker_bumpersticker-128891884094199352?rf=238630728040783772">"Free Mark Cuban" Bumper Stickers!<</a> Hang in there! Go Mark! We at LibertyManiacs.com are fully behind you and are slapping on our href=”http://www.zazzle.com/free_mark_cuban_bumper_sticker_bumpersticker-128891884094199352?rf=238630728040783772″>”Free Mark Cuban” Bumper Stickers!< Hang in there!

]]> By: Carter http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55047 Carter Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:44:07 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55047 Mark I have always been impressed by the way you speak the truth. The topics you touch on one would never see a man of your means comment on - and I thank you for it. You could keep it to yourself - gosh knows you don't need to educate others to how the world really works. Including the Ponzi scam that is Wall Street - can't help to think that because of your abilty to speak out like you did on Fox the other day - calling Wall Street criminals to the mat. Things you nary hear the so called pundits mention. Not mention your movie. This stinks to high heaven - here they are releasing this nonsense on you while the Wall Street criminals who literally blow up the world with FAKE, COUNTERFEIT, FRAUDULAUNT financial vehicles go unscathed. Unbelievable. I hope this does not change you...we need you to shine the light of truth on this scum. Mark I have always been impressed by the way you speak the truth. The topics you touch on one would never see a man of your means comment on – and I thank you for it. You could keep it to yourself – gosh knows you don’t need to educate others to how the world really works. Including the Ponzi scam that is Wall Street – can’t help to think that because of your abilty to speak out like you did on Fox the other day – calling Wall Street criminals to the mat. Things you nary hear the so called pundits mention. Not mention your movie. This stinks to high heaven – here they are releasing this nonsense on you while the Wall Street criminals who literally blow up the world with FAKE, COUNTERFEIT, FRAUDULAUNT financial vehicles go unscathed. Unbelievable. I hope this does not change you…we need you to shine the light of truth on this scum.

]]> By: richard rainey http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55041 richard rainey Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:11:18 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55041     Mr. Best     What I have read about this case so far leads me to make an observation about Mr. Cuban's dilemma that nobody seems to hve observed from what has been stated or commented about. To me Mr. Faure in initiating the contact with Mr. Cuban and revealing proprietary information to him was criminal on Mr. Faure part. As Mr. Faure's revealed this proprietary information in order to induce Mr. Cuban to invest in the new issue he (Mr. Faure) might have actually been engaging in an extortion of Mr. Cuban. This gambit of Mr. Faure's had two purposes, one was to induce Mr. cuban into buying the new issue or if he refused to than have him locked in knowing this information which would prevent the sale of his shares until the Pipe was introduced. Mr. Cuban, not owning a sufficient amount of shares or being directly or indirectly connected to the company is not subject to the SEC rules. Mr. Cuban was only protecting his personal property, the shares in mamma, from what he believe was a reckless business decision on the part of Mr. Faure. Mr. Cuban had know solid knowledge that the stocks would go up or down. The only similarity between Mr. Cuban and Martha Stewart is that both are being used to divert action from something. In Mr. Cuban's case it could be the Cubs purchase. In the Stewart case it was diverting attention for the Bush appointee at the FDA who released proprietary information to the CEO of Bristol-Myers who in turn told Sam Waskel. That appointee snuck back to Texas and never hit the spotlight and got a better job. Yet everybody else went to jail.     Mr. Best     What I have read about this case so far leads me to make an observation about Mr. Cuban’s dilemma that nobody seems to hve observed from what has been stated or commented about. To me Mr. Faure in initiating the contact with Mr. Cuban and revealing proprietary information to him was criminal on Mr. Faure part. As Mr. Faure’s revealed this proprietary information in order to induce Mr. Cuban to invest in the new issue he (Mr. Faure) might have actually been engaging in an extortion of Mr. Cuban. This gambit of Mr. Faure’s had two purposes, one was to induce Mr. cuban into buying the new issue or if he refused to than have him locked in knowing this information which would prevent the sale of his shares until the Pipe was introduced. Mr. Cuban, not owning a sufficient amount of shares or being directly or indirectly connected to the company is not subject to the SEC rules. Mr. Cuban was only protecting his personal property, the shares in mamma, from what he believe was a reckless business decision on the part of Mr. Faure. Mr. Cuban had know solid knowledge that the stocks would go up or down.
The only similarity between Mr. Cuban and Martha Stewart is that both are being used to divert action from something. In Mr. Cuban’s case it could be the Cubs purchase. In the Stewart case it was diverting attention for the Bush appointee at the FDA who released proprietary information to the CEO of Bristol-Myers who in turn told Sam Waskel. That appointee snuck back to Texas and never hit the spotlight and got a better job. Yet everybody else went to jail.

]]> By: Lakes http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55039 Lakes Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:38:53 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55039 I am pretty sure you are on top of things and most likely have read this piece. Here's the link: http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/hueston112108.htm You should take the SEC to trial over this. I'm a currently taking some public relations courses. One of them is reputation management. In my opinion, I would say that being aggressively proactive with this is the right way to ensure that your name and business does not get entirely sullied; even when you are innocent of all charges. Future business dealings may be affected regardless of that fact that you did nothing wrong. Public relations is simply performance plus communication. I say that you aggressively communicate through your actions. Press charges!!! Cheers I am pretty sure you are on top of things and most likely have read
this piece. Here’s the link:

http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/hueston112108.htm

You should take the SEC to trial over this. I’m a currently taking
some public relations courses. One of them is reputation management.
In my opinion, I would say that being aggressively proactive with this
is the right way to ensure that your name and business does not get
entirely sullied; even when you are innocent of all charges. Future
business dealings may be affected regardless of that fact that you
did nothing wrong.
Public relations is simply performance plus communication. I say that
you aggressively communicate through your actions. Press charges!!!

Cheers

]]> By: Fan http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55028 Fan Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:14:36 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55028 Mark Cuban you are innocent!....too many haters out there Mark Cuban you are innocent!….too many haters out there

]]> By: Thomas Molitor http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55023 Thomas Molitor Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:46:09 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55023 Mark, don't let your blog get bogged down by publishing legal briefs otherwise you'll become today's Lenny Bruce. Mark, don’t let your blog get bogged down by publishing legal briefs
otherwise you’ll become today’s Lenny Bruce.

]]> By: ballardpresents http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55021 ballardpresents Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:37:27 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55021 The insider trading rule is completely stupid. If you are given information that your stock is about to drop in value how can you not act on it? How can the SEC not expect someone to act on this kind of information? www.ballardpresents.com The insider trading rule is completely stupid. If you are given information that your stock is about to drop in value how can you not act on it? How can the SEC not expect someone to act on this kind of information?

http://www.ballardpresents.com

]]> By: If Only He Wasn’t So Kooky! « Blog Of Fire http://blogmaverick.com/2008/11/18/sec-p2/#comment-55019 If Only He Wasn’t So Kooky! « Blog Of Fire Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:05:59 +0000 http://blogmaverick.wordpress.com/?p=873#comment-55019 [...] other news, I’m now following the Mark Cuban/SEC hilarity, which illustrates well the extreme corruption of our government and the adorably juvenile behavior [...] [...] other news, I’m now following the Mark Cuban/SEC hilarity, which illustrates well the extreme corruption of our government and the adorably juvenile behavior [...]

]]>