<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HDNet and MMA = Happy Customers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 21:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: topmounter</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[topmounter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thankfully Comcast has seen fit to keep HDNet in my local line-up.  The sad part is that even after spending 20+ years in the cable industry, HDNet is one of the few channels that keeps me paying for cable service and not relying solely on my Roku and AppleTV to receive television content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankfully Comcast has seen fit to keep HDNet in my local line-up.  The sad part is that even after spending 20+ years in the cable industry, HDNet is one of the few channels that keeps me paying for cable service and not relying solely on my Roku and AppleTV to receive television content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maverick money makers</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maverick money makers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sneak Inside Maverick Money Makers Club   &#160;Href [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sneak Inside Maverick Money Makers Club   &nbsp;Href [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why You Should Own An Mma T-shirt &#124; Customized Tee Shirts</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why You Should Own An Mma T-shirt &#124; Customized Tee Shirts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  HDNet and MMA = Happy Customers  Unlike the NBA, NHL and NFL, the only athletes getting paid a lot of money to wear T Shirts are MMA fighters. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  HDNet and MMA = Happy Customers  Unlike the NBA, NHL and NFL, the only athletes getting paid a lot of money to wear T Shirts are MMA fighters. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edwarddfw78</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edwarddfw78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Affliction, tapout and all the others have been showing up at Marshalls and Ross for months.  That trend is soon to die.  MMA might still be popular but those brands are at the point where you look foolish wearing any of them.  

You may not shop at Ross (obviously) but for a long time (actually well over a year, this doesn&#039;t apply to Affliction) the shirt racks have been dominated by MMA gear, Tapout and One More mostly but there are many others... Affliction held on to their brand equity a bit longer but very few people think that its cool anyore (aside from the clueless that still wear it).  It is soon to go the way of Von Dutch (when was the last time you saw anyone wearing that who wasn&#039;t wearing it while doing blue collar work in the Texas heat?).

I think the growth of MMA will continue but the clothing is dead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Affliction, tapout and all the others have been showing up at Marshalls and Ross for months.  That trend is soon to die.  MMA might still be popular but those brands are at the point where you look foolish wearing any of them.  </p>
<p>You may not shop at Ross (obviously) but for a long time (actually well over a year, this doesn&#8217;t apply to Affliction) the shirt racks have been dominated by MMA gear, Tapout and One More mostly but there are many others&#8230; Affliction held on to their brand equity a bit longer but very few people think that its cool anyore (aside from the clueless that still wear it).  It is soon to go the way of Von Dutch (when was the last time you saw anyone wearing that who wasn&#8217;t wearing it while doing blue collar work in the Texas heat?).</p>
<p>I think the growth of MMA will continue but the clothing is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmyadams1</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmyadams1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 US MMA Championships (Only for Americans Fighters) suite…

100 000$ for the championships winners
50 000$ for the championships losers 
(75 000$ for draws)
10 000$ for the semifinalists winners
5000$ for the semifinalists losers 
(7500$ for draws)

Total by event (14 fights): 1 150 000$
Total by year (3 Events): 3 450 000$
Grand Slam Jackpots (3 championships win of 3 in the same year): 200 000$]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 US MMA Championships (Only for Americans Fighters) suite…</p>
<p>100 000$ for the championships winners<br />
50 000$ for the championships losers<br />
(75 000$ for draws)<br />
10 000$ for the semifinalists winners<br />
5000$ for the semifinalists losers<br />
(7500$ for draws)</p>
<p>Total by event (14 fights): 1 150 000$<br />
Total by year (3 Events): 3 450 000$<br />
Grand Slam Jackpots (3 championships win of 3 in the same year): 200 000$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmyadams1</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmyadams1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 US MMA Championships (Only for Americans Fighters) 

3 Championships by year and by class, In April, in August, and in December

14 Fights by Event, 7 Titles Championships bouts &amp; 7 Challengers bouts (Championships Semifinals)

Seven Weight class: Lightweight (160 pounds), Welterweight (170 pounds), Middleweight (180 pounds), Super Middleweight    (190 pounds),   Light Heavyweight (200 pounds), Cruiserweight (210 pounds),   Heavyweight   (+210 pounds)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 US MMA Championships (Only for Americans Fighters) </p>
<p>3 Championships by year and by class, In April, in August, and in December</p>
<p>14 Fights by Event, 7 Titles Championships bouts &amp; 7 Challengers bouts (Championships Semifinals)</p>
<p>Seven Weight class: Lightweight (160 pounds), Welterweight (170 pounds), Middleweight (180 pounds), Super Middleweight    (190 pounds),   Light Heavyweight (200 pounds), Cruiserweight (210 pounds),   Heavyweight   (+210 pounds)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markcuban</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markcuban]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thank you !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirsha</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sirsha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just called and dropped my HD tier.  When I ordered it, I asked for the tier that included HD Net.  Now that it is gone, it isn&#039;t worth the extra $$$ for me.

I wish I could use a Dish where I live.

http://sirshannon.com/2009/05/31/time-warner-drops-hdnet-sirshannon-drops-his-hd-tier/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just called and dropped my HD tier.  When I ordered it, I asked for the tier that included HD Net.  Now that it is gone, it isn&#8217;t worth the extra $$$ for me.</p>
<p>I wish I could use a Dish where I live.</p>
<p><a href="http://sirshannon.com/2009/05/31/time-warner-drops-hdnet-sirshannon-drops-his-hd-tier/" rel="nofollow">http://sirshannon.com/2009/05/31/time-warner-drops-hdnet-sirshannon-drops-his-hd-tier/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildwhitewoody</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wildwhitewoody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 21:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My condolences on the Time Warner decision. I was hoping that there would be a game saving three at the final hour on May 28. The whole thing seems a bit fishy to me and does not sit well in my stomach. Like another player involved. But who the hell knows?

I was on espn and checking out Bill Simmons blog the only one that has a pulse and was glad to see you as the guest. I learned a lot. So genetics ehh? 

Sorry about last post misclick.

Mark Farwell
WW espn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My condolences on the Time Warner decision. I was hoping that there would be a game saving three at the final hour on May 28. The whole thing seems a bit fishy to me and does not sit well in my stomach. Like another player involved. But who the hell knows?</p>
<p>I was on espn and checking out Bill Simmons blog the only one that has a pulse and was glad to see you as the guest. I learned a lot. So genetics ehh? </p>
<p>Sorry about last post misclick.</p>
<p>Mark Farwell<br />
WW espn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildwhitewoody</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/22/hdnet-and-mma-happy-customers/#comment-65030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wildwhitewoody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1306#comment-65030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My condolences on the Time Warner decision. I was hoping that there would be a game saving three at the final hour on May 28. The whole thing seems a bit fishy to me and does not sit well in my stomach. Like another player involved. But who the hell knows?

 I was on espn and checking out Bill Simmons blog the only one that has a pulse and was gla]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My condolences on the Time Warner decision. I was hoping that there would be a game saving three at the final hour on May 28. The whole thing seems a bit fishy to me and does not sit well in my stomach. Like another player involved. But who the hell knows?</p>
<p> I was on espn and checking out Bill Simmons blog the only one that has a pulse and was gla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

