Comments on: The Google – Youtube – Conundrum

By: busokak

busokak — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:48:56 +0000

I think, The Google is best FT

By: KAET Eight » Blog Archive » Google’s YouTube Problem

KAET Eight » Blog Archive » Google’s YouTube Problem — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:11:43 +0000

[...] The Google – YouTube – Conundrum [...]

By: MaverickMoneyMakers

MaverickMoneyMakers — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:20:43 +0000

My first thought when it comes to Google is that they want to Rule The World. I mena, look at their actions. Nofollow tags, linking strategies, SEO (black or white) and so on and so forth.

I believe Google is getting old prematurely. Buying Youtube is nothing more than another way to keep “control” of the masses. I mean what google have to give you besides a good SE? Nothing. Becuse the keyword tool NECESSITY was born from a Google idea from the start. When there were no Google there was no keyword tools. It’s even easier, look at some so called “authority” sites and see what they really have to offer. There is nothing different that a lousy website put up together yesterday. Still, the main focus is on money for both. etc etc etc…

IMO Google … sucks already.

By: Capitalist Punks » Twitter - Nobel Peace Prize for keeping service live? Really?

Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:30:12 +0000

[...] towards profitability is both concerning and charming, notwithstanding somewhat awe-inspiring. I mean, what happens when VCs or big companies can/will no longer subsidize finance-hogging business… like [...]

By: resmitatiller

resmitatiller — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:44:47 +0000

If you asked 10 people on the street how much bandwidth costs or who that money goes to, how many could answer you? People will not pay for something unless they think they know where the money is going. +1 bro.

By: resmitatiller

resmitatiller — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:43:38 +0000

I would bet that Google could find a way to charge for premium video hosting in a way that businesses and power users would pony up. But still offer casual users free hosting of their singing dogs. True. http://www.cumleceviri.com/
Maybe they could do something to preempt the point of diminishing returns by subsidizing revenue with something like the Hulu/Pandora approach where there’s a forced ad view to gain access to upload each new video. http://www.angielskopolski.com/
Advertisers are nervous about putting their brand next to unknown content on YouTube. They are much more likely to advertise on Hulu.com which has high quality TV programming. http://www.canliuydu.com/ What happens to the internet and how we use it when those subsidies end is a country song that will eventually be written.

By: skylinejackson

skylinejackson — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:26:28 +0000

Mark! Dude, check out the revolution…The Free Throw Revolution! Here is the link to open your iTunes:

http://tinyurl.com/nl9j7j

iFreeThrow

Shoot to the Rhythm!

By: fchunter

fchunter — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:30:32 +0000

I usually use yahoo. Very satisfied. If you need to upload to my server bandwith yet.

By: Brady

Brady — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:36:36 +0000

Question: Do you think that the introduction of Google Wave will play into this at all?

By: The Google – Youtube – Conundrum « ISP2.0 Blog

The Google – Youtube – Conundrum « ISP2.0 Blog — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:26:32 +0000

[...] June 8, 2009 at 2:26 am · Filed under Uncategorized and tagged: google, video The Google – Youtube – Conundrum [...]