<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Quick Ditty on Free &#8211; Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: performancepartsj</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-66122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[performancepartsj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-66122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I say the growth treadmill. Let&#039;s face it, by opening up Facebook to everyone they have generated a bigger audience. Bigger audience means more browsers, having more browsers makes advertising more attractive to potential customers. I think Facebook sky rocketed over the past year or so and still is. I know many people including myself enjoy the layout much more than MySpace etc...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say the growth treadmill. Let&#8217;s face it, by opening up Facebook to everyone they have generated a bigger audience. Bigger audience means more browsers, having more browsers makes advertising more attractive to potential customers. I think Facebook sky rocketed over the past year or so and still is. I know many people including myself enjoy the layout much more than MySpace etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thekidd</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thekidd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s probably just me, but having your mom&#039;s friend from high school ask to be your friend on FB kind of ruins the fun... It&#039;s weird. It&#039;s like everyone can sign up + join, so there&#039;s no selectivity [for lack of a better word] in it... everyone has one.

dominica]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably just me, but having your mom&#8217;s friend from high school ask to be your friend on FB kind of ruins the fun&#8230; It&#8217;s weird. It&#8217;s like everyone can sign up + join, so there&#8217;s no selectivity [for lack of a better word] in it&#8230; everyone has one.</p>
<p>dominica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whitewoody</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whitewoody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate facebook and twitter is for TWiTS. 
Cause they get paid and use the information to sell products and hmmm try to put you into a category.
WEll no thanks. 

Its hard to believe that now at least 30% of people are marrying by people they meet online. Is that a good thing?
People nowadays are to afraid to meet people in person and have the Confidence to ask someone out for fear of rejection.

I think I am changing my whole mindset. Sports I am even fading away from to a new mission a more important goal. The stock market I just finally said MERCY.

  God is healing me from society&#039;s addictions one by one now I am going to start living. I will fear no man but God. I will care more about the Ducks Unlimited then the Anaheim ducks.

People can change and I still owe you what I promised for Seven years but I am far from Texas. So I will enjoy this Stampede here I reckon.

Good Luck 
Trip KINGS
Mark Farwell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate facebook and twitter is for TWiTS.<br />
Cause they get paid and use the information to sell products and hmmm try to put you into a category.<br />
WEll no thanks. </p>
<p>Its hard to believe that now at least 30% of people are marrying by people they meet online. Is that a good thing?<br />
People nowadays are to afraid to meet people in person and have the Confidence to ask someone out for fear of rejection.</p>
<p>I think I am changing my whole mindset. Sports I am even fading away from to a new mission a more important goal. The stock market I just finally said MERCY.</p>
<p>  God is healing me from society&#8217;s addictions one by one now I am going to start living. I will fear no man but God. I will care more about the Ducks Unlimited then the Anaheim ducks.</p>
<p>People can change and I still owe you what I promised for Seven years but I am far from Texas. So I will enjoy this Stampede here I reckon.</p>
<p>Good Luck<br />
Trip KINGS<br />
Mark Farwell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bizexpress</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bizexpress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel that the way facebook could really help its members in the &quot;business&quot; market is to enable them to &quot;collaborate&quot; on a more direct level. This can be enhanced with online labs, setting up of project teams; establishing special forums to discuss alternative ways to get financed, establish strategic partners; and connect with people who want to help you! 

At my new company &quot;the Bize eXpress&quot; @ http://talkbizexpress.blogspot.com/ discusses these things and more. Our goal is to create social and face-to-face opportunities for entrepreneurs to collaborate and maximize their time in getting to the right people and using the best resources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that the way facebook could really help its members in the &#8220;business&#8221; market is to enable them to &#8220;collaborate&#8221; on a more direct level. This can be enhanced with online labs, setting up of project teams; establishing special forums to discuss alternative ways to get financed, establish strategic partners; and connect with people who want to help you! </p>
<p>At my new company &#8220;the Bize eXpress&#8221; @ <a href="http://talkbizexpress.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://talkbizexpress.blogspot.com/</a> discusses these things and more. Our goal is to create social and face-to-face opportunities for entrepreneurs to collaborate and maximize their time in getting to the right people and using the best resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sophiemwt</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophiemwt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have left it like it was, as an .edu site only.

It would be used as a traffic generator for money sites as the population ages and is thrown over the wall of the walled garden.

To have that many users at the beginning of the consumer life cycle is a gold mine if you hang on to them. Don&#039;t expand the free site so they park there forever.

As they age and their needs change, send them to FacebookJoeShmoe for their early working years. Monetize with resume services, job listings, etc. 

As they get married and build families, move them to that life stage...FacebookMarriedwithKids then on and on until they get to FacebookNursingHome which is monetized with everything age related. 

Some users would start right off as a free user with facebook and would need a growing period. They&#039;re you&#039;re freebies-soon-to-consume. 

They love you so much on facebook that when they&#039;re older, more mature, yet still want to hang on to that college thing you&#039;re there. With advertisers, products, etc. By then, they aren&#039;t broke college kids using beer bongs as stemware.

Basically, use facebook like most websites use Google. As a giant on-ramp to the money sites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have left it like it was, as an .edu site only.</p>
<p>It would be used as a traffic generator for money sites as the population ages and is thrown over the wall of the walled garden.</p>
<p>To have that many users at the beginning of the consumer life cycle is a gold mine if you hang on to them. Don&#8217;t expand the free site so they park there forever.</p>
<p>As they age and their needs change, send them to FacebookJoeShmoe for their early working years. Monetize with resume services, job listings, etc. </p>
<p>As they get married and build families, move them to that life stage&#8230;FacebookMarriedwithKids then on and on until they get to FacebookNursingHome which is monetized with everything age related. </p>
<p>Some users would start right off as a free user with facebook and would need a growing period. They&#8217;re you&#8217;re freebies-soon-to-consume. </p>
<p>They love you so much on facebook that when they&#8217;re older, more mature, yet still want to hang on to that college thing you&#8217;re there. With advertisers, products, etc. By then, they aren&#8217;t broke college kids using beer bongs as stemware.</p>
<p>Basically, use facebook like most websites use Google. As a giant on-ramp to the money sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cambronhardaway</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cambronhardaway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free: The Future of a Radical Price -- Chris Anderson
Read It Mark, unless you already have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free: The Future of a Radical Price &#8212; Chris Anderson<br />
Read It Mark, unless you already have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gurley on the &#8220;Free&#8221; Business Model &#171; abovethecrowd.com</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Gurley on the &#8220;Free&#8221; Business Model &#171; abovethecrowd.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are Going to Die By Free,&#8221; &#8220;Google Is Learning the Reality of Free,&#8221; and &#8220;A Quick Ditty on Free.&#8221; Mark, like Malcolm highlights many of the dark elements of the Free model. Namely, it is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are Going to Die By Free,&#8221; &#8220;Google Is Learning the Reality of Free,&#8221; and &#8220;A Quick Ditty on Free.&#8221; Mark, like Malcolm highlights many of the dark elements of the Free model. Namely, it is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewsf</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matthewsf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, love your commentary. Perhaps too technical an answer, but...

Not sure if this is rhetorical question or not. The short of it is it depends on the owner&#039;s ambitions vs. the business model. Obviously we know where FB netted out and so their model has set sail.

Colleagues ask me where I see FB netting out and I truly have no idea compared with other internet services. Had they just focused on college students, though students would have grown older and outgrown the service that was tailored, maybe jumping to some modified LinkedIn or Doostang, who knows.

As you well know, there are two ways to monetize online, performance advertising and brand advertising. I think the challenge I see with Facebook is their inability to match their product focus with the type of revenue focus they want in the short term.

The bigger question to me now is how does Facebook scale into brand advertising, assuming they continue lift the bar on their performance CPMs. It&#039;s a challenge that MySpace, eGroups, many others couldn&#039;t figure out and I&#039;m still at loss to suggest why Facebook would be any different.

My only other point would be with access to economies of scale so easily online and barriers to entry so small, in my experience it&#039;s easier to defend the small barriers erected around vertical businesses (advertising mix, single unique product configuration, etc) over horizontal businesses that have to scale across multiple advertising groups. Hence, perhaps, edu.

Expedia is still with us; as is Autobytel.
If you&#039;re going to be horizontal, you better be sure their is necessary transactional element and necessary-utility-to-the-user component to your business (a la Amazon, eBay, Google, not MySpace, eGroups, etc.).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, love your commentary. Perhaps too technical an answer, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Not sure if this is rhetorical question or not. The short of it is it depends on the owner&#8217;s ambitions vs. the business model. Obviously we know where FB netted out and so their model has set sail.</p>
<p>Colleagues ask me where I see FB netting out and I truly have no idea compared with other internet services. Had they just focused on college students, though students would have grown older and outgrown the service that was tailored, maybe jumping to some modified LinkedIn or Doostang, who knows.</p>
<p>As you well know, there are two ways to monetize online, performance advertising and brand advertising. I think the challenge I see with Facebook is their inability to match their product focus with the type of revenue focus they want in the short term.</p>
<p>The bigger question to me now is how does Facebook scale into brand advertising, assuming they continue lift the bar on their performance CPMs. It&#8217;s a challenge that MySpace, eGroups, many others couldn&#8217;t figure out and I&#8217;m still at loss to suggest why Facebook would be any different.</p>
<p>My only other point would be with access to economies of scale so easily online and barriers to entry so small, in my experience it&#8217;s easier to defend the small barriers erected around vertical businesses (advertising mix, single unique product configuration, etc) over horizontal businesses that have to scale across multiple advertising groups. Hence, perhaps, edu.</p>
<p>Expedia is still with us; as is Autobytel.<br />
If you&#8217;re going to be horizontal, you better be sure their is necessary transactional element and necessary-utility-to-the-user component to your business (a la Amazon, eBay, Google, not MySpace, eGroups, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: courtlandallen</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[courtlandallen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What sense would it have made for Facebook to stay small and focused on college students? It was a good way for them to gain a foothold in the beginning and make the change from 0 users to millions, but it&#039;s not viable long-term strategy.

From a logical standpoint, people who join the service in college will eventually graduate and go into the workforce, so you can&#039;t keep it college-only forever. What happens when these older Facebook users want to invite their friends to events, groups, etc but their friends still aren&#039;t allowed to join the site? A college-only Facebook would eventually lose out to some generalized megasite that simply let anyone join.

I also don&#039;t understand why it would be harder to target ads if your site has more people. It&#039;s still easy for Facebook to differentiate between the college students and non-college students on its site... simply having more people doesn&#039;t limit their ability to target certain demographics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sense would it have made for Facebook to stay small and focused on college students? It was a good way for them to gain a foothold in the beginning and make the change from 0 users to millions, but it&#8217;s not viable long-term strategy.</p>
<p>From a logical standpoint, people who join the service in college will eventually graduate and go into the workforce, so you can&#8217;t keep it college-only forever. What happens when these older Facebook users want to invite their friends to events, groups, etc but their friends still aren&#8217;t allowed to join the site? A college-only Facebook would eventually lose out to some generalized megasite that simply let anyone join.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t understand why it would be harder to target ads if your site has more people. It&#8217;s still easy for Facebook to differentiate between the college students and non-college students on its site&#8230; simply having more people doesn&#8217;t limit their ability to target certain demographics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techrip</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/07/07/a-quick-ditty-on-free-part-3/#comment-65628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[techrip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1333#comment-65628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not a difficult question. Its about generating PROFIT. Facebook relies on advertising dollars to make a profit. The greater the total number of potential buyers, as well as the broader demographic ranges covered will generate significantly more revenue, than paid adds targeted to one strict demographic. The infrastructure and product was already developed, it was just time to get it in as many hands as possible. Their growth has declined in certain areas, but overall growth is still increasing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not a difficult question. Its about generating PROFIT. Facebook relies on advertising dollars to make a profit. The greater the total number of potential buyers, as well as the broader demographic ranges covered will generate significantly more revenue, than paid adds targeted to one strict demographic. The infrastructure and product was already developed, it was just time to get it in as many hands as possible. Their growth has declined in certain areas, but overall growth is still increasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

