<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why TV Networks Should Support Net Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The key to understanding net neutrality: Anonymity=good, egalitarianism=bad: Oddhead Blog: Prediction Markets, Gambling, Electronic Commerce, Artificial Intelligence: David Pennock: Yahoo! Research</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-66339</link>
		<dc:creator>The key to understanding net neutrality: Anonymity=good, egalitarianism=bad: Oddhead Blog: Prediction Markets, Gambling, Electronic Commerce, Artificial Intelligence: David Pennock: Yahoo! Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-66339</guid>
		<description>[...] 2009/08/27: Mark Cuban (as always) says it well. [Via Tom Murphy]   This entry is filed under commentary, economics, politics, technology. You can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2009/08/27: Mark Cuban (as always) says it well. [Via Tom Murphy]   This entry is filed under commentary, economics, politics, technology. You can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cuban on Net Neutrality &#171; The Enterprise Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65975</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cuban on Net Neutrality &#171; The Enterprise Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65975</guid>
		<description>[...] current Dallas Mavs owner Mark Cuban offers an illustration of how net neutrality regulations would slow media innovation to a crawl. It&#8217;s a good example of why engineers should be permitted to experiment with the evolution of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] current Dallas Mavs owner Mark Cuban offers an illustration of how net neutrality regulations would slow media innovation to a crawl. It&#8217;s a good example of why engineers should be permitted to experiment with the evolution of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techzn</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65860</link>
		<dc:creator>techzn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65860</guid>
		<description>Rather than typing more I&#039;ll just link to another rational person&#039;s blog

http://www.zachbair.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than typing more I&#8217;ll just link to another rational person&#8217;s blog</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zachbair.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zachbair.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techzn</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65859</link>
		<dc:creator>techzn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65859</guid>
		<description>Emergency systems would be given top priority in any sanely run network.  Voice and video would get priority over data that takes less bandwidth and can be sequenced out of order.

The point of net neutrality is not to say &quot;F this everything goes!&quot;  It&#039;s to keep ISPs from censoring and ruining the internet in favor of their other endeavors.  For instance time warner cable and their extreme dislike for freely provided television content on network websites.  It&#039;s to keep them from price gouging and making their own rules when they have a monopoly or at best duopoly.  Their costs continue to go down, while they say they have to raise prices.  You can&#039;t show me numbers that say otherwise unless you lie about it.

Your concerns would be real, the fact that entertainment shouldn&#039;t cause lag in say 911 VOIP calls or something.  This is where network administration comes in.  I don&#039;t assume there is anything in net neutrality saying network administrators will be a thing of the past.  

Use common sense, first of all.  I like how you use the argument that we just don&#039;t have the bandwidth for all of these new applications to coexist, yet ISPs say upgrading to DOCSIS 3.0 is pointless because that much bandwidth isn&#039;t needed yet. 

I guess the best way to put it, is after some form of net neutrality is passed into law, and the internet and all of our means of communication do not suddenly implode, you will see what I was talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emergency systems would be given top priority in any sanely run network.  Voice and video would get priority over data that takes less bandwidth and can be sequenced out of order.</p>
<p>The point of net neutrality is not to say &#8220;F this everything goes!&#8221;  It&#8217;s to keep ISPs from censoring and ruining the internet in favor of their other endeavors.  For instance time warner cable and their extreme dislike for freely provided television content on network websites.  It&#8217;s to keep them from price gouging and making their own rules when they have a monopoly or at best duopoly.  Their costs continue to go down, while they say they have to raise prices.  You can&#8217;t show me numbers that say otherwise unless you lie about it.</p>
<p>Your concerns would be real, the fact that entertainment shouldn&#8217;t cause lag in say 911 VOIP calls or something.  This is where network administration comes in.  I don&#8217;t assume there is anything in net neutrality saying network administrators will be a thing of the past.  </p>
<p>Use common sense, first of all.  I like how you use the argument that we just don&#8217;t have the bandwidth for all of these new applications to coexist, yet ISPs say upgrading to DOCSIS 3.0 is pointless because that much bandwidth isn&#8217;t needed yet. </p>
<p>I guess the best way to put it, is after some form of net neutrality is passed into law, and the internet and all of our means of communication do not suddenly implode, you will see what I was talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brettglass</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65855</link>
		<dc:creator>brettglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65855</guid>
		<description>Mark, good to see you speaking the truth and being insightful as usual. It&#039;s a shame that sites like DSL Reports have nothing better to do but &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Mark-Cuban-Professional-Troll-103753&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mindlessly libel you&lt;/a&gt; without in any way refuting your ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, good to see you speaking the truth and being insightful as usual. It&#8217;s a shame that sites like DSL Reports have nothing better to do but <a HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Mark-Cuban-Professional-Troll-103753" rel="nofollow">mindlessly libel you</a> without in any way refuting your ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brettglass</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65854</link>
		<dc:creator>brettglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65854</guid>
		<description>Mark, good to see you speaking the truth and being insightful as usual. It&#039;s a shame that sites like DSL Reports have nothing better to do but &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://wordpress.com/activate/c9a17669747970b7&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mindlessly libel you&lt;/a&gt; without in any way refuting your ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, good to see you speaking the truth and being insightful as usual. It&#8217;s a shame that sites like DSL Reports have nothing better to do but <a HREF="http://wordpress.com/activate/c9a17669747970b7" rel="nofollow">mindlessly libel you</a> without in any way refuting your ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parkeren</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65851</link>
		<dc:creator>parkeren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65851</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sudojudo</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65827</link>
		<dc:creator>sudojudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65827</guid>
		<description>Great thought-provoking post, Mark. The topic of Net Neutrality always seems to get the blood up.

Net Neutrality bickering reminds me of my college days when we would register for classes. Certain types of people would get “priority registration.” Disabled students got first dibs, followed by scholarship athletes, then came the seniors and so on. Took me 5 ½ years to get the classes I needed to graduate. Students always whined about the athletes. But hey, that&#039;s a state school for you. And athletes helped fill the university&#039;s coffers.

In the future you propose I wonder what kind of bits would end up at the top of the food chain? Who would decide that? And how much would it cost to buy your way onto the top of the pyramid? Because that&#039;s what we&#039;re really talking about here isn&#039;t it?

I suppose it&#039;s inevitable that when resources are limited there&#039;s going to be a prioritization process. It just makes me sad to think that kids being born today are going to have their access to information limited by the size of Daddy&#039;s wallet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thought-provoking post, Mark. The topic of Net Neutrality always seems to get the blood up.</p>
<p>Net Neutrality bickering reminds me of my college days when we would register for classes. Certain types of people would get “priority registration.” Disabled students got first dibs, followed by scholarship athletes, then came the seniors and so on. Took me 5 ½ years to get the classes I needed to graduate. Students always whined about the athletes. But hey, that&#8217;s a state school for you. And athletes helped fill the university&#8217;s coffers.</p>
<p>In the future you propose I wonder what kind of bits would end up at the top of the food chain? Who would decide that? And how much would it cost to buy your way onto the top of the pyramid? Because that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re really talking about here isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s inevitable that when resources are limited there&#8217;s going to be a prioritization process. It just makes me sad to think that kids being born today are going to have their access to information limited by the size of Daddy&#8217;s wallet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop the Cap! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Abusive Relationship: Mark Cuban&#8217;s Ongoing Love Affair With Big Cable, Despite Having His Networks Thrown Off Time Warner Cable</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65822</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop the Cap! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Abusive Relationship: Mark Cuban&#8217;s Ongoing Love Affair With Big Cable, Despite Having His Networks Thrown Off Time Warner Cable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65822</guid>
		<description>[...] offers a bizarre rant about why that spells the death of online video, something he&#8217;s never been thrilled with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] offers a bizarre rant about why that spells the death of online video, something he&#8217;s never been thrilled with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denexile</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/08/03/why-tv-networks-should-support-net-neutrality/#comment-65821</link>
		<dc:creator>denexile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1342#comment-65821</guid>
		<description>This assumes, of course, that the tv networks have any idea what they are doing in the online space.  As evidenced by the free giveaways of content on Hulu, etc., thereby completely devaluing their most treasured properties, they do not.  Have any idea what the hell they&#039;re doing, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This assumes, of course, that the tv networks have any idea what they are doing in the online space.  As evidenced by the free giveaways of content on Hulu, etc., thereby completely devaluing their most treasured properties, they do not.  Have any idea what the hell they&#8217;re doing, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
