<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whats the Difference Between Youtube Today and Broadcast Networks ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ipotpallaptopski</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ipotpallaptopski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Youtube is a brute force media solution. &quot;Put it all in a bucket and let the customer decide.&quot; Well this only works well for small media. And for a bunch of good reasons. The effort(cost) of finding what you &quot;might&quot; want to see on youtube is already far too great. And adSense in reality is far too low on CPM compared to broadcast media advertising. That&#039;s why this model costs Google hundreds of millions per year instead of generating revenue. Media companies can&#039;t afford that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube is a brute force media solution. &#8220;Put it all in a bucket and let the customer decide.&#8221; Well this only works well for small media. And for a bunch of good reasons. The effort(cost) of finding what you &#8220;might&#8221; want to see on youtube is already far too great. And adSense in reality is far too low on CPM compared to broadcast media advertising. That&#8217;s why this model costs Google hundreds of millions per year instead of generating revenue. Media companies can&#8217;t afford that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbprealtygroup</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jbprealtygroup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more off the wall the better when it comes to generating interest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more off the wall the better when it comes to generating interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa12363</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lisa12363]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are all waiting for technology to catch up. Broadband TV  and interactive TV from our portable devices and in our homes is less than five years away.  Hang out and stay tuned for this.  Someone who now owns a popular or soon to be well known .tv domain will one day in 10 years be a well known broadcast channel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are all waiting for technology to catch up. Broadband TV  and interactive TV from our portable devices and in our homes is less than five years away.  Hang out and stay tuned for this.  Someone who now owns a popular or soon to be well known .tv domain will one day in 10 years be a well known broadcast channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can our beloved "old" television channels survive the Internet revolution? (part 1/2) &#124; surfing-dormouse</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can our beloved "old" television channels survive the Internet revolution? (part 1/2) &#124; surfing-dormouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] actually have a choice?) but each and every time, Facebook and Youtube are taking a share of it and bringing the audience, not the other way [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] actually have a choice?) but each and every time, Facebook and Youtube are taking a share of it and bringing the audience, not the other way [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uwsnycusa</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uwsnycusa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#039;t Fox do this with &quot;Glee&quot; the pilot was made available on Hulu several months ago and it is now on primetime this Fall... I love Hulu especially now that it has so many of the networks on board...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Fox do this with &#8220;Glee&#8221; the pilot was made available on Hulu several months ago and it is now on primetime this Fall&#8230; I love Hulu especially now that it has so many of the networks on board&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just2words</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[just2words]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d prefer the networks and cable providers provide an auction directly to us viewers.  I&#039;ll bid up to $2 for this channel this month, or say $35 for this block of channels for the next 12 months.

I am sick of paying for stuff I never use. Let the chips fall where they may. I could care less that 45 channels are music only. I could care less about the 700 Club channel and the Polish language channel and dozens more.

Let me pay for what I want, not what you think I should.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer the networks and cable providers provide an auction directly to us viewers.  I&#8217;ll bid up to $2 for this channel this month, or say $35 for this block of channels for the next 12 months.</p>
<p>I am sick of paying for stuff I never use. Let the chips fall where they may. I could care less that 45 channels are music only. I could care less about the 700 Club channel and the Polish language channel and dozens more.</p>
<p>Let me pay for what I want, not what you think I should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlouderb</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlouderb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 03:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, you are right on.  This is exactly what is already happening.  Check out YouTube yesterday - they let a channel called &quot;FailBlog&quot; take over their Spotlight - AKA the home page -- where they spotlighted a few of their videos and then launched a few new videos.  Those videos, including Behind the scenes, Name Fail, Bass Swing, etc, all now have nearly 500k views in two days.  http://www.youtube.com/user/failblog

I&#039;ve spent a fair bit of the summer trying to get better at YouTube for Revision3.  I&#039;m not close to where some of the best are - but I see YouTube as of extreme strategic value for Revision3.  

For most of the reasons you outline - and others too.

I&#039;m assuming HDNet is doing the same thing - let&#039;s connect up our channels by favoriting, friending, subscribing and commenting on each other&#039;s videos!

jim louderback (ceo revision3)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you are right on.  This is exactly what is already happening.  Check out YouTube yesterday &#8211; they let a channel called &#8220;FailBlog&#8221; take over their Spotlight &#8211; AKA the home page &#8212; where they spotlighted a few of their videos and then launched a few new videos.  Those videos, including Behind the scenes, Name Fail, Bass Swing, etc, all now have nearly 500k views in two days.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/failblog" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/failblog</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent a fair bit of the summer trying to get better at YouTube for Revision3.  I&#8217;m not close to where some of the best are &#8211; but I see YouTube as of extreme strategic value for Revision3.  </p>
<p>For most of the reasons you outline &#8211; and others too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming HDNet is doing the same thing &#8211; let&#8217;s connect up our channels by favoriting, friending, subscribing and commenting on each other&#8217;s videos!</p>
<p>jim louderback (ceo revision3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loucons</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[loucons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why not turn all of TV into On-Demand? Let the networks have a set schedule they choose, essentially what it is now, but then offer the rest of their shows on-demand. 

For example you can just have finished watching House on Fox, and perhaps American Idol is scheduled next. If you don&#039;t want to watch that you can flip through whichever on-demand options Fox has, and watch Family Guy or something else.

Fox can perhaps get feedback on people&#039;s preferences to see which shows people watch on-demand often, and incorporate those into the regular lineup. Fox can also see which shows people are tuning out as well. The viewer gets more choices, Fox gets feedback to provide better programming and offer a better product. 

The only thing I don&#039;t know is if the technology is there to make it feasible. And also how will cable/satellite distributors react since they offer their own On-demand programming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not turn all of TV into On-Demand? Let the networks have a set schedule they choose, essentially what it is now, but then offer the rest of their shows on-demand. </p>
<p>For example you can just have finished watching House on Fox, and perhaps American Idol is scheduled next. If you don&#8217;t want to watch that you can flip through whichever on-demand options Fox has, and watch Family Guy or something else.</p>
<p>Fox can perhaps get feedback on people&#8217;s preferences to see which shows people watch on-demand often, and incorporate those into the regular lineup. Fox can also see which shows people are tuning out as well. The viewer gets more choices, Fox gets feedback to provide better programming and offer a better product. </p>
<p>The only thing I don&#8217;t know is if the technology is there to make it feasible. And also how will cable/satellite distributors react since they offer their own On-demand programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uzayterapisi</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uzayterapisi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uzay terapisi]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uzay terapisi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzzsaw55</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-between-youtube-today-and-broadcast-networks/#comment-66434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buzzsaw55]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1395#comment-66434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark - 
this is off topic, but why don&#039;t you throw a ton of money at the NFL (use pennies and nickels) and buy the rights to show every NFL game ever played &quot;on demand&quot; and in HD. Figure $4.95 a game and no one would care that they were paying any other HD channels.
Z]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211;<br />
this is off topic, but why don&#8217;t you throw a ton of money at the NFL (use pennies and nickels) and buy the rights to show every NFL game ever played &#8220;on demand&#8221; and in HD. Figure $4.95 a game and no one would care that they were paying any other HD channels.<br />
Z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

