<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why You Want TV Everywhere &#8211; Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: okathleen</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66804</link>
		<dc:creator>okathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66804</guid>
		<description>We should all be reading poetry by candlelight anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should all be reading poetry by candlelight anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ta11grass</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66748</link>
		<dc:creator>ta11grass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66748</guid>
		<description>Hello Mark-
I realize this is not the best place to solicit an idea, but it does give me an entree to you.  I&#039;m representing a company that is in interactive TV advertising.  They have a proven technology and solve the number one problem advertisers have, how to get more people to watch ads and how to get greater brand awareness.  With this company, you would get &quot;paid&quot; to watch commercials on your favorite shows.  People want to be interactive (think of the 50 million votes on American Idol each week).  I look forward to your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mark-<br />
I realize this is not the best place to solicit an idea, but it does give me an entree to you.  I&#8217;m representing a company that is in interactive TV advertising.  They have a proven technology and solve the number one problem advertisers have, how to get more people to watch ads and how to get greater brand awareness.  With this company, you would get &#8220;paid&#8221; to watch commercials on your favorite shows.  People want to be interactive (think of the 50 million votes on American Idol each week).  I look forward to your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shammons1</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66741</link>
		<dc:creator>shammons1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66741</guid>
		<description>I got the Slingbox HD earlier this year so I can watch games while on the road and it is awesome!  Like you said Mark you can&#039;t save the content so you have to have a connection but even over WiFi it&#039;s not bad!.  The only problem that I have sometimes is the buffering depending on the speed of the network I&#039;m on.  

The initial cost upfront was minimal in my opinion and after using it I can&#039;t see myself paying extra outside of my cable costs to get a similar service!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the Slingbox HD earlier this year so I can watch games while on the road and it is awesome!  Like you said Mark you can&#8217;t save the content so you have to have a connection but even over WiFi it&#8217;s not bad!.  The only problem that I have sometimes is the buffering depending on the speed of the network I&#8217;m on.  </p>
<p>The initial cost upfront was minimal in my opinion and after using it I can&#8217;t see myself paying extra outside of my cable costs to get a similar service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desotomavs</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66735</link>
		<dc:creator>desotomavs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66735</guid>
		<description>OMG Jason Terry has his own song!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXGhmSUbOho&amp;feature=related

Fans are posting video&#039;s on youtube of them dancing to it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2q2yzJI517U

Yahoo(sports) and Dime magazine,amongst others, have already written articles about it. I hear he might debute the dance tomorrow at open practice.

Google &quot;Do the Jason Terry&quot; &amp; &quot;Do tha Jason Terry&quot; and see how many articles pop up!

As the biggest Die hard Mavs fan ever, you have to play this!!!! It might be just what we need to when that championship ring. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG Jason Terry has his own song!!!!<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXGhmSUbOho&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXGhmSUbOho&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>Fans are posting video&#8217;s on youtube of them dancing to it:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2q2yzJI517U" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2q2yzJI517U</a></p>
<p>Yahoo(sports) and Dime magazine,amongst others, have already written articles about it. I hear he might debute the dance tomorrow at open practice.</p>
<p>Google &#8220;Do the Jason Terry&#8221; &amp; &#8220;Do tha Jason Terry&#8221; and see how many articles pop up!</p>
<p>As the biggest Die hard Mavs fan ever, you have to play this!!!! It might be just what we need to when that championship ring. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: performancepartsj</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66733</link>
		<dc:creator>performancepartsj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66733</guid>
		<description>I think your right Mark. We all pay a hefty bill for TV/Cable. Why should we not be able to watch it anywhere we so please? I&#039;d love to be able to catch some of a game on my iPhone. Especially if I&#039;m somewhere and I can&#039;t catch the NYRangers game. As long as your paying for the service I see no harm. I&#039;m sure that&#039;s the concern though. People figuring out how to exploit the TV Anywhere system...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your right Mark. We all pay a hefty bill for TV/Cable. Why should we not be able to watch it anywhere we so please? I&#8217;d love to be able to catch some of a game on my iPhone. Especially if I&#8217;m somewhere and I can&#8217;t catch the NYRangers game. As long as your paying for the service I see no harm. I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s the concern though. People figuring out how to exploit the TV Anywhere system&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: performancepartsj</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66732</link>
		<dc:creator>performancepartsj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66732</guid>
		<description>I think your right Mark. We all pay a hefty bill for TV/Cable. Why should we not be able to watch it anywhere we so please? I&#039;d love to be able to catch some of a game on my iPhone. Especially if I&#039;m somewhere and I can&#039;t catch the NYRangers game. As long as your paying for the service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your right Mark. We all pay a hefty bill for TV/Cable. Why should we not be able to watch it anywhere we so please? I&#8217;d love to be able to catch some of a game on my iPhone. Especially if I&#8217;m somewhere and I can&#8217;t catch the NYRangers game. As long as your paying for the service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slheinlein</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66727</link>
		<dc:creator>slheinlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66727</guid>
		<description>This is great and I would love to have TV Everywhere as well.  However, the challenge for MSO, Telco&#039;s, Sattelite companies is the business model.  No one has been able to make money on online video as the online advertising model hasn&#039;t worked to date.  YouTube, even with its dominance in online video, is estimated to lose $1 million each day.

True, you can charge for the TV Everywhere service but the question is can you charge enough.  Or in other words, how much are consumers willing to pay?  Is this going to be enough to make a profitalbe service.  Video is such a bandwidth intensive product, the network requirements to offer a TV Everywhere service is extensive.  Servers, caching, routers, switches, data centers, etc. and the costs are significant.

In the words of a TV exec discussing online video...&#039;we are trading analog dollars for digital pennies&#039;.  Until a profitable business model is determined, TV Everywhere will be a niche service with limited video and distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great and I would love to have TV Everywhere as well.  However, the challenge for MSO, Telco&#8217;s, Sattelite companies is the business model.  No one has been able to make money on online video as the online advertising model hasn&#8217;t worked to date.  YouTube, even with its dominance in online video, is estimated to lose $1 million each day.</p>
<p>True, you can charge for the TV Everywhere service but the question is can you charge enough.  Or in other words, how much are consumers willing to pay?  Is this going to be enough to make a profitalbe service.  Video is such a bandwidth intensive product, the network requirements to offer a TV Everywhere service is extensive.  Servers, caching, routers, switches, data centers, etc. and the costs are significant.</p>
<p>In the words of a TV exec discussing online video&#8230;&#8217;we are trading analog dollars for digital pennies&#8217;.  Until a profitable business model is determined, TV Everywhere will be a niche service with limited video and distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: storiapix</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66725</link>
		<dc:creator>storiapix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66725</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the post and for your comment about how much it costs to produce a TV show. It needed to be said. Because for someone to feel that $1.99 is expensive to download, say, an episode of &quot;House&quot; or &quot;The Simpsons&quot; or &quot;30 Rock&quot; or any brilliantly written and performed  30-minute or one-hour program is astonishing. That&#039;s less than the price of most cups of coffee. 

When you think of the imagination, hard work, and sheer dollar amounts that go into the creation, selling, writing, directing, talent, production, marketing, and distribution of any TV program --and  scripted hour-long dramas filmed on location are really up there -- it&#039;s small wonder that the entertainment industry is obliged to find a revenue stream capable of paying for it.

You are right — nothing of value is free. Unless it&#039;s been stolen. In the old commercial broadcast model, we paid by the presence of frequent advertising interruptions. Happily for consumers, there are now alternatives. That&#039;s fair, as long as the entertainment provider can still find a way to make money. And I don&#039;t mean a greedy, disgusting level of profit, just a healthy business return. With all the resentment of corporations duly acknowledged, consumers need to think about what would happen if enough advertisers fled the medium or drastically reduced what they are currently willing to pay to sponsor quality programming.

The cost of premium entertainment would skyrocket, and we could find ourselves with nothing left to watch but cheaper-to-produce reality fare and user-generated content. Not that some of it isn&#039;t fun stuff, but I think we can all admit to loving a good story well told.

What troubles me most about this discussion is the disturbing trend of entitlement that you touched on in your post. I admit to a certain bias as a content creator, but that said, I&#039;m sincere in my belief that we&#039;re lucky to get for $1.99 what some risk taker paid $2 million or more to create. And the only reason we&#039;re able to get such a bargain is if millions of other people are willing to do likewise.

-- Marci Montgomery</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the post and for your comment about how much it costs to produce a TV show. It needed to be said. Because for someone to feel that $1.99 is expensive to download, say, an episode of &#8220;House&#8221; or &#8220;The Simpsons&#8221; or &#8220;30 Rock&#8221; or any brilliantly written and performed  30-minute or one-hour program is astonishing. That&#8217;s less than the price of most cups of coffee. </p>
<p>When you think of the imagination, hard work, and sheer dollar amounts that go into the creation, selling, writing, directing, talent, production, marketing, and distribution of any TV program &#8211;and  scripted hour-long dramas filmed on location are really up there &#8212; it&#8217;s small wonder that the entertainment industry is obliged to find a revenue stream capable of paying for it.</p>
<p>You are right — nothing of value is free. Unless it&#8217;s been stolen. In the old commercial broadcast model, we paid by the presence of frequent advertising interruptions. Happily for consumers, there are now alternatives. That&#8217;s fair, as long as the entertainment provider can still find a way to make money. And I don&#8217;t mean a greedy, disgusting level of profit, just a healthy business return. With all the resentment of corporations duly acknowledged, consumers need to think about what would happen if enough advertisers fled the medium or drastically reduced what they are currently willing to pay to sponsor quality programming.</p>
<p>The cost of premium entertainment would skyrocket, and we could find ourselves with nothing left to watch but cheaper-to-produce reality fare and user-generated content. Not that some of it isn&#8217;t fun stuff, but I think we can all admit to loving a good story well told.</p>
<p>What troubles me most about this discussion is the disturbing trend of entitlement that you touched on in your post. I admit to a certain bias as a content creator, but that said, I&#8217;m sincere in my belief that we&#8217;re lucky to get for $1.99 what some risk taker paid $2 million or more to create. And the only reason we&#8217;re able to get such a bargain is if millions of other people are willing to do likewise.</p>
<p>&#8211; Marci Montgomery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karenksn</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66708</link>
		<dc:creator>karenksn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66708</guid>
		<description>Until the TV Everywhere business model is deployed (and it will be, eventually)I have found that Slingbox works quite well. For instance, today I am sitting in my hotel room in Beijing China watching all of my favorite new fall shows on my PC that were recorded this week on my DVR at home in Los Angeles. Through Slingbox I can access my home DVR from anywhere in the world as well as watch live programming. For it to work you must leave your tv on at home. They now also have a new app for the iphone too! This might work for you until TVE is launched!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until the TV Everywhere business model is deployed (and it will be, eventually)I have found that Slingbox works quite well. For instance, today I am sitting in my hotel room in Beijing China watching all of my favorite new fall shows on my PC that were recorded this week on my DVR at home in Los Angeles. Through Slingbox I can access my home DVR from anywhere in the world as well as watch live programming. For it to work you must leave your tv on at home. They now also have a new app for the iphone too! This might work for you until TVE is launched!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canamgirl</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/#comment-66672</link>
		<dc:creator>canamgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1407#comment-66672</guid>
		<description>I am in education and have spent the last five years teaching undergraduates public speaking. There is definitely worth in having televised video streaming at our finger tips, but I currently have trouble preventing students from texting during class; I couldn&#039;t imagine the difficulty of getting them to break away from a televised marathon.  Could mass lethargia ensue? I know that watching episodes of 24 have become quite similar to peoples description of crack cocaine...I just need one more...what would that do if it was something I could access anytime, any place?  
Just some food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in education and have spent the last five years teaching undergraduates public speaking. There is definitely worth in having televised video streaming at our finger tips, but I currently have trouble preventing students from texting during class; I couldn&#8217;t imagine the difficulty of getting them to break away from a televised marathon.  Could mass lethargia ensue? I know that watching episodes of 24 have become quite similar to peoples description of crack cocaine&#8230;I just need one more&#8230;what would that do if it was something I could access anytime, any place?<br />
Just some food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
