<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think the Internet Will Replace Cable ? Read this first</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/</link>
	<description>the mark cuban weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 21:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deancollins</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deancollins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Beevok, yep but i dont think anyone is saying ip delivery of content is directly the replacement for cable.

It will be some kind of morph with not only video but additional functionality.

Look at Boxee - you wouldn&#039;t say that this is a direct replacement for a VCR would you?

My startup at the moment isn&#039;t directly working on the carriage of the video itself but external services that will be part of the eventual outcome whatever it is morphed into.

Cheers,
Dean Collins
www.Cognation.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Beevok, yep but i dont think anyone is saying ip delivery of content is directly the replacement for cable.</p>
<p>It will be some kind of morph with not only video but additional functionality.</p>
<p>Look at Boxee &#8211; you wouldn&#8217;t say that this is a direct replacement for a VCR would you?</p>
<p>My startup at the moment isn&#8217;t directly working on the carriage of the video itself but external services that will be part of the eventual outcome whatever it is morphed into.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dean Collins<br />
<a href="http://www.Cognation.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.Cognation.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beevok</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beevok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you noticed this trend: media don&#039;t seem to &quot;replace&quot; each other? 
The radio was supposed to replace the newspaper.
The TV was suppose to replace the radio.
Then again, no guarantee history will repeat itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you noticed this trend: media don&#8217;t seem to &#8220;replace&#8221; each other?<br />
The radio was supposed to replace the newspaper.<br />
The TV was suppose to replace the radio.<br />
Then again, no guarantee history will repeat itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuban rains on Internet video parade &#171; The Digitalists</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cuban rains on Internet video parade &#171; The Digitalists]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by Daniel on February 4, 2010  Mark Cuban has a forceful rebuttal to those who think the Internet can replace cable TV as the main source of video for the average [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Daniel on February 4, 2010  Mark Cuban has a forceful rebuttal to those who think the Internet can replace cable TV as the main source of video for the average [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I Caved, Bought Cable TV, And Gave Up On My &#8216;Hulu Household&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why I Caved, Bought Cable TV, And Gave Up On My &#8216;Hulu Household&#8217;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] enough deals to make an online-based, a-la-carte TV service available to the masses. (Though Mark Cuban&#8217;s concerns &#8212; that there isn&#8217;t enough Internet bandwidth available to make a product like this a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enough deals to make an online-based, a-la-carte TV service available to the masses. (Though Mark Cuban&#8217;s concerns &#8212; that there isn&#8217;t enough Internet bandwidth available to make a product like this a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imoria</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imoria]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MC,

Is Right! Ustream can&#039;t even get their website to work on firefox. I have embed video on a website I built for a client and every time you visit the website ustream crashes firefox. It&#039;s a joke and MC is right. I do like MC idea about getting your own channel. I know Google is offering commercial spots through adwords, perhaps they should offer your own channels and spots, etc. 

- IMORIA.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC,</p>
<p>Is Right! Ustream can&#8217;t even get their website to work on firefox. I have embed video on a website I built for a client and every time you visit the website ustream crashes firefox. It&#8217;s a joke and MC is right. I do like MC idea about getting your own channel. I know Google is offering commercial spots through adwords, perhaps they should offer your own channels and spots, etc. </p>
<p>- IMORIA.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Monetize Online Video Based on Audience Size &#171; The Ambitious Life</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How to Monetize Online Video Based on Audience Size &#171; The Ambitious Life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a position that&#160;Mark Cuban&#160;in particular opposes, most recently claiming that the&#160;Internet will not replace cable.&#160; Medium Viewership = Subscription and Sponsorships For medium sized audiences, say between [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a position that&nbsp;Mark Cuban&nbsp;in particular opposes, most recently claiming that the&nbsp;Internet will not replace cable.&nbsp; Medium Viewership = Subscription and Sponsorships For medium sized audiences, say between [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Monetize Online Video Based on Audience Size - YouCastr</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How to Monetize Online Video Based on Audience Size - YouCastr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a position that&#160;Mark Cuban&#160;in particular opposes, most recently claiming that the&#160;Internet will not replace cable.&#160; Medium Viewership = Subscription and Sponsorships For medium sized audiences, say between [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a position that&nbsp;Mark Cuban&nbsp;in particular opposes, most recently claiming that the&nbsp;Internet will not replace cable.&nbsp; Medium Viewership = Subscription and Sponsorships For medium sized audiences, say between [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jafy</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jafy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And add 1 more to the column for online video vs. cable tv.  YouTube just signed a deal to deliver live sports.  Granted it is cricket and not the NFL or NBA, but the argument that cable tv has a lock on live sports is looking less and less convincing.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jan/20/youtube-live-indian-premier-league
&lt;strong&gt;
From MC&gt; since when is streaming live sports new ? its been happening for more than 10 years. just because youtube does it doesnt make it a game changer&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And add 1 more to the column for online video vs. cable tv.  YouTube just signed a deal to deliver live sports.  Granted it is cricket and not the NFL or NBA, but the argument that cable tv has a lock on live sports is looking less and less convincing.<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jan/20/youtube-live-indian-premier-league" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jan/20/youtube-live-indian-premier-league</a><br />
<strong><br />
From MC&gt; since when is streaming live sports new ? its been happening for more than 10 years. just because youtube does it doesnt make it a game changer</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chamoen</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chamoen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that every argument against tv over the net is because of the streaming issue for live events.  Park this one...

People choose surfthechannel and ninjavideo over dvds.  The quality is crap, you run the risk of spyware/malware/etc, and the process is overall fairly painful.

However, it&#039;s still less painful than TV.  Forget timeshifting (a ridiculous concept that needs to die).  Forget the cable On-Demand services - Rogers on Demand here in Canada is embarrassingly bad.

And add on that as a HD customer (again, Rogers in Canada), I have to scroll through hundreds of channels to figure out what I have and what I don&#039;t have because of a hilarious marketing decision.
&lt;strong&gt;
From MC&gt; or you can set the favorites on your remote and scroll through 10 channels. But even scrolling through 100 networks on your tv is easier and faster than searching the net trying to find something you like, and then hoping it streams or downloads correctly. then of course you are forced to watch it on your pc, unless you want to go through the hassle of connecting your pc to your tv and tying up  your PC. Of course you could stream from your pc to your tv over your wireless at home, but then you wipe out your bandwidth at home so that if anyone else wants to do something on wi-fi, or you want to have your PC working on other things, you cant.&lt;/strong&gt;

Give me a monthly service where I pay either an all-in price or per-use price for the shows I want.  I don&#039;t care about live events (oscars or sports), and I get my news online.

What do I need cable for?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that every argument against tv over the net is because of the streaming issue for live events.  Park this one&#8230;</p>
<p>People choose surfthechannel and ninjavideo over dvds.  The quality is crap, you run the risk of spyware/malware/etc, and the process is overall fairly painful.</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s still less painful than TV.  Forget timeshifting (a ridiculous concept that needs to die).  Forget the cable On-Demand services &#8211; Rogers on Demand here in Canada is embarrassingly bad.</p>
<p>And add on that as a HD customer (again, Rogers in Canada), I have to scroll through hundreds of channels to figure out what I have and what I don&#8217;t have because of a hilarious marketing decision.<br />
<strong><br />
From MC&gt; or you can set the favorites on your remote and scroll through 10 channels. But even scrolling through 100 networks on your tv is easier and faster than searching the net trying to find something you like, and then hoping it streams or downloads correctly. then of course you are forced to watch it on your pc, unless you want to go through the hassle of connecting your pc to your tv and tying up  your PC. Of course you could stream from your pc to your tv over your wireless at home, but then you wipe out your bandwidth at home so that if anyone else wants to do something on wi-fi, or you want to have your PC working on other things, you cant.</strong></p>
<p>Give me a monthly service where I pay either an all-in price or per-use price for the shows I want.  I don&#8217;t care about live events (oscars or sports), and I get my news online.</p>
<p>What do I need cable for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shafttoe</title>
		<link>http://blogmaverick.com/2010/01/13/think-the-internet-will-replace-cable-read-this-first/#comment-68099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shafttoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmaverick.com/?p=1494#comment-68099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you thought much about the impact fiber optic in the end user&#039;s home will make? Buffering problems will disappear...
Service providers such as Comcast, Cox, etc. will need to lay fiber instead of cable or they will be woefully slow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you thought much about the impact fiber optic in the end user&#8217;s home will make? Buffering problems will disappear&#8230;<br />
Service providers such as Comcast, Cox, etc. will need to lay fiber instead of cable or they will be woefully slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

